Editorial
Crass
incompetence - that's what it was
The whole
world came to a halt last week with the disaster at Mnajdra. Newspapers
and editorials passed judgement and shed tears for an action that
could not be understood. And then on Friday hundreds walked in
Valletta Ö asking for what?
In this
issue, we carry an opinion by columnist, David Pace, with the
title: It finally happened. And today we carry Alternattiva Demokratika's
call for Dr Galea's resignation.
We may borrow
this, for it encompasses the truth about accountability.
Are we surprised
that out there, there are Maltese who are capable of such actions?
Are we surprised
that this happened?
What we
are surprised at is that monies and grants were available and
they were not utilised. And this, in our opinion, is crass incompetence.
Let us not
mince our words, it is either the blame of the curator, Mr Tony
Pace or the minister responsible: Dr Louis Galea.
And yes,
we are pointing a finger.
And yes,
we are saying that someone must be held responsible and if necessary
resign.
Why should
we be surprised when both governments, past and present, have
sanctioned development that has obliterated our national heritage?
Do we need
to give examples?
Malta and
Gozo are peppered with archaeological, historical and ecological
gems. Full protection for all these sites is near to impossible,
but protection for some of these sites is and was possible.
Education
and Culture minister Louis Galea and his curator of museums know
this all too well.
They are,
unfortunately, the responsible ones. It could have been the minister's
predecessor, Labour spokesman Evarist Bartolo, who was lucky enough
not to have faced the onslaught of some lunatics on the temples.
But it did not happen under Mr Bartolo, so Mr Bartolo is out of
the picture.
The Dr Galea
excuse that a heritage bill was in the offing is pie in the sky
and as David Pace states in his column, there were countless instances
in the past when the authorities could and should have taken action.
The reactions
to the Mnajdra disaster by both Dr Galea and Mr Pace are not to
be taken seriously.
The actions
at Mnajdra are actions that have been perpetrated before and believe
it or not also under a Nationalist administration.
One need
not look at the Mnajdra episode to see what constitutes a local
uncultured and unscrupulous character.
Look at
our surroundings, our valleys, our historical monuments, the little
Nature around us and the general state of these Islands.
The vile
acts against Mnajdra are a drop in the ocean compared to the rape
of our national heritage over the past 15 - 20 years.
And what
is the difference between dismantling a Neolithic structure or
sanctioning the building of a hotel around it as at the New Dolmen
hotel?
And what
about the development that has been allowed over the last 20 years
by consecutive governments leading to the eradication of so many
unique sites?
The post
Mnajdra saga needs to address one issue; that is the decision
to ignore the need for security measures.
No specific
budgeting was needed for this, no special commissions, no consultants
- just a simple decision. And that, dear minister and curator,
was lacking.
If the curator
had suggested this but was refused because of a permanent secretary
ruling or a ministerial decision, then the ball must fall flatly
and squarely in ësomeone's' court.
The people
in this country are sick and tired of charades.
They want
action and some serious stuff too.
The
Lino Spiteri interview
The Lino
Spiteri interview with Lou Bondi was good television. Unfortunately
for the TV audience, Mr Spiteri was far too polite and humble.
He need not have been.
Mr Spiteri,
as we all know, was one of Malta's brightest boys.
Let us face
it, he was a success story. A young, successful politician, a
Central Bank governor, charming, arrogant, intelligent, a writer,
a columnist, a whiz kid and very affluent
Yet, (and
he does not deny this), he was also a cabinet minister when Malta
went through some very ugly incidents.
Yes, we
agree with Mr Spiteri, not everything can be blamed on the Labourites,
but then how much can be blamed on others?
Mr Lino
Spiteri governed when it was a liability to talk against the state
even if one were a Labourite and when it was close to a death
sentence if one were politically active.
One issue
we would have loved to tackle with Mr Spiteri was over accountability
and ideology.
And on the
latter: Is the MLP the party for the workers or of some underclass?
Is it a socialist party? What does it stand for?
If so, then
why are its representatives as Bohemian and bourgeoise (bobo's)
as the PN, or perhaps more so?
And why,
Mr Spiteri, should one continue to call himself a Labourite or
a Nationalist, when there are more similitudes than differences?
|