sacred
cows
Just
who is flying the flag?
Miiriam
Dunn wonders why we are so selective in where we channel our national
pride
The word nationalism
has cropped up in the news on a predictably regular basis since
the EU debate intensified and especially since the severely-underestimated
CNI lobby launched itself into the public eye.
Nationalism,
sovereignty and independence are words that litter our newspapers,
TV discussion shows and radio phone-ins with monotonous regularity,
every time the EU issue raises its head and many a time when it
doesn't.
The trouble
with hearing these phrases being spouted on call, as it were,
is that they can lose their real meaning, and risk becoming nothing
but buzzwords. Or, worse still, they are adopted or perhaps kidnapped
by rhetoricians and opinion writers who have little knowledge,
or even much interest in what they really stand for, but simply
decide to use them for their own means.
Why am I
making this point, you may ask?
Because
rarely have I seen a better example of ambivalence than the attitude
towards nationalism, or, more accurately, national pride, than
in certain aspects of life here in Malta.
National
pride as a subject is often waxed lyrical and done to death on
a platform at a political rally.
It serves
as the perfect crowd-igniter when bringing up issues that are
simultaneously beefy, yet intangible, such as independence and
sovereignty.
But I cannot
help asking why that same national pride seems to dissolve at
a level that is admittedly more mundane, but can be viewed as
equally important.
Where is
that feeling of loyalty and patriotism when the country's football
team needs supporting, or when we get down to the nitty gritty
of deciding who is going to finance the clean-up and more that
the island so desperately needs?
One example
comes vividly to mind; last September's airshow.
I was covering
the event myself and was interested to hear that after the display
to be given by the world-renowned Red Arrows, there would be a
show by a Maltese aerobatic team. The commentator making the announcement
told us how prestigious this event was, how hard the three Maltese
pilots had worked and encouraged the spectators to give them a
round of applause as they took to the skies.
As I stood
in the press enclosure making sure I jotted down the name of the
Maltese pilot leading the team, with a view to requesting an interview
with him after the event, what did I witness? Rather than reeiving
backing from their nation, those men were given their nation's
backs - the spectators turned away and started heading for the
exit.
Granted,
as the pilot, George Abela, told me afterwards, it was not a particularly
clever idea to put the Maltese team on after the UK's most talented
aerobatics; in Mr Abela's wonderful words: "Even the angels would
have trouble flying after the Red Arrows."
But to leave
instead of cheering on your own lads? Or worse still, as I can
testify, make fun of them? I even overheard sick jokes made by
people who were homeward bound that they wouldn't be surprised
if the Maltese pilots crashed. Would you believe it?
National
football, or the lack of support for it, is a subject that has
been done to death over the years, but still worth a mention at
this juncture, surely.
When we
publish our sports photographs, just as noticeable as the action
in the picture is the stand behind the players which is almost
always deserted.
The only
exceptions I have witnessed to this scene are when certain teams
with an irrationally, illogically large following on Maltese soil
have decided to grace us with their presence, which they do purely
for their own publicity and financial purposes, I can assure you.
During the
last friendlies and world cup qualifiers at Ta' Qali, for example,
I was informed that the Swedish fans, who had flown over specially
for the event, outdid the Maltese spectators in embarrassing numbers.
Comments damning the performance of the Maltese side were probably
based on the final score rather than on a firsthand witness of
the game, on the grounds that both England and Italy were playing
in matches being relayed on TV that night, so most football enthusiasts'
attention was undoubtedly channelled elsewhere.
I find the
fact that Malta is unlikely to qualify for any major international
football competition an inconceivable reason for not supporting
the national team. In the same way I view supporting a team because
it tends to win matches and leagues regularly just as unfathomable,
although this seems to be the criteria for many who support Manchester
United. The only other stipulation appears to be that you live
outside of Manchester, but I'd better not take that point any
further, for fear of red devil retribution, and I digress anywayÖ
The point
I'm making is that as most nations will tell you, they might lament
the matches when their lads let them down, but they support their
team irrespective of performance.
England
is a prime example of this. Its national football team has certainly
seen better days - one day, actually, in 1966. And many say that
part of its problem is that it still lives in that era, resting
on a very false vision that it is still up there with other teams
that are of a world class status, while the truth is that it has
been struggling for some time.
Only now
is England making the massive spring clean of fusty players that
many believe is long overdue, alongside the even more drastic
measure of appointing a foreign coach.
But that
has never affected the fan base.
And where
is our national pride when it comes to the look of the island,
or, more importantly, the issue of who is going to pay for it?
The vast
majority of us moan about the state of the island and say we would
like to see something done about it. But just look at the reactions
that come tumbling from the fax machines of the constituted bodies
when anyone in authority dares to outline measures to collect
more revenue.
Everyone
wants the island to look better, providing they don't personally
have to fork out any more for it, so it seems.
There seems
to be a philosophy that one's own money goes on the upkeep of
what is only on the inside of a front door, or perhaps also the
inside of a garage - a garage big enough to house a boat, as well
as two cars, in many cases.
Perhaps
the question we should be asking is why we are so selective about
where we direct our national pride. It's always easier to expound
on the intangible than the tangible, admittedly, and an oratory
brimming with nationalistic fervour would certainly be no exception.
But there are some very real people out there waving the Maltese
flag on the nation's behalf that deserve our support, not our
indifference, and certainly not our derisory comments.
|