|
By
Paul Cachia 
The issue of abortion extends far
beyond the taking of life. Abortion requires consideration
of what is just and whether a pregnant woman has the right
to decide. There are many diverging views. Rather than answering
bluntly, I would like to put forward some questions.
Is it the womans right to terminate
the pregnancy considering that it is her body? Is the woman
solely responsible being the only or the major party affected
by the pregnancy? Does the father have a say in the termination
of the pregnancy? Generally, his role is supportive. Being
a parent is a profound responsibility financial,
psychological, and moral. But when a man decides to abort
on behalf of the woman is this wrong?
Is it fair to bring a child into
a world that cannot provide it with a meaningful life? If
the woman is poor, or cannot give her child a good upbringing,
is having the child the right thing to do?
Pro-abortion groups say that there
are many legitimate reasons why a rational woman might have
an abortion accidental pregnancy, rape, birth defects,
danger to her health. Is this true? And if a pregnant woman
acts capriciously, then should she be condemned morally
or treated as a murderer?
Rights, the pro-choice groups claim,
do not pertain to a potential, only to an actual being.
A child cannot acquire any rights until it is born. How
would then an abortion be defined if the foetus were considered
a person?
Whether it is ethical to abort the
pregnancy and thus terminate a potential human life is the
broad problem that fuels the never-ending abortion debate.
However, if my mother or yours for all it matters, decided
to abort in her time, I would not be here to write down
these lines, more so yourself to read them. I believe the
value of life cannot be questioned!
Mr
Cachia is a journalist with www.di-ve.com
|
By
Mary Grace Vella
The resistance of society to regard a womans body
as her own is strongly evident in the area of a womans
reproductive process. Becoming a mother means a total life
change. It calls upon a woman to make an irrevocable lifelong
commitment in terms of emotional involvement, financial
burdens and loss of freedom. Yet, historically, the last
person to have any control over whether and when pregnancy
occurred was the woman herself.
If married, she did not have the right to deny sex to her
husband and until decades ago, artificial methods of birth
control were unreliable. And as soon as more effective methods
to prevent pregnancy were developed, society and law makers
resisted in giving women access to these means of controlling
their bodies and their lives.
However, as long as reproductive technology is controlled
by men, it will be utilised not to empower women but to
consolidate male power. The fact that only women can reproduce
is a source of power which women should control.
Women do not terminate their pregnancies just because they
want to, without a justifiable reason. Generally, there
exists a combination of physical, psychological and social
forces that justify the womans decision of termination.
For many pro-choice believers, termination of pregnancy
is a necessary evil, one that must be tolerated and supported
until such time as better sex education, more effective
contraception and a more just social order makes motherhood
by choice possible.
In our present social reality, abortion or any other means
of termination of preganancy, however undersirable this
might be, is in certain cases the only solution to the problem
of unwanted preganancy.
Here and now, there are women who need or desire abortion
and neither the legal status of abortion in a particular
country nor the health risks associated with having an illegal
abortion, will deter them from terminating their unwanted
pregnancies. Because of this, termination of preganancy
services ought to be safely accessible and readily available
in every country, if only as a means of harm reduction.
In my opinion, this is not being pro-abortion, this is
being realistic!
Ms
Vella is a Graffitti activist. The article reflects her
personal opinion.
|