|
campaign
Animal
Rights
When
animal welfare is natural
The
deputy leader of the Labour party, Joe Brincat, is as well known
for his love of animals as for his political career. Today he
tells MIRIAM DUNN what he believes can be done to improve animal
rights in Malta and the challenges NGOs and the authorities face
along the way
He is well known for his love of animals, has been a vegetarian
for over a decade and shares the concern voiced by a number of
animal rights activists that any new legislation in this
sphere could end up being nothing more than a piece of paper if
not implemented in the right way.
The
deputy leader of the Labour party, Joe Brincat, who traces his
love of animals back to the days he spent in Burmarrad with his
grandfather - a herdsman - believes that just as important as
new legislation on animal rights is educating the public.
Dr
Brincat, who has three dogs and once saved a horse from the slaughterhouse
by taking it in exchange for professional fees, knows only too
well that legislation alone is not always enough to change a situation.
"I
remember how, in 1980, as Justice Minister, I introduced the first
closed season for hunting of birds of passage," he recalls.
"During the summer I went to Gozo, and in a particular village
the 'festa' was being celebrated.
"To
raise funds, the Parish Priest had organised a lottery, the prize
being a shotgun. This was being carried around by an altar boy.
The Parish Priest was jubilant in his festive regalia, while selling
tickets, as I watched. A policeman was standing a few steps away
from me and I said to him: With police officers with your
thinking, it is absolutely senseless to enact laws! Don't you
know that shotguns can only be carried by people who hold a licence,
and a boy of 12 can never have a licence? "
Dr
Brincat, who says it is his ambition to have a small, unpretentious
farm and keep a few sheep, believes the NGOs have a role to play
in publicising new legislation.
"In
the field of animal welfare legislation, the speed of regulation
is of the essence," he said. "It may be technical and
directed at particular circumstances or species or situations.
Such unforeseen circumstances need to be addressed as one comes
across them, and speedily."
I
ask Dr Brincat how he feels about whether the NGOs are under-funded.
"One
must be careful, as resources are always scarce," he answers.
"If the funds are wasted, then the animals do not benefit
from them. I would like to see more contributions from individuals,
even very small contributions from children, to welfare groups.
And accounts should be monitored independently from the organisations
to dispel any suspicion that the money is not reaching its final
beneficiary."
And
does he agree with the NGOs that the government should be focusing
on a national neutering programme?
"I
have my reservations about this," he replies. "I always
prefer a whole animal as created by the One above. For example,
I didnt put my name on a waiting list for a vasectomy!"
I
am interested to know whether Dr Brincat thinks that education
and enforcement are important in equal measure where animal welfare
is concerned and if he thinks we are doing enough of either.
"Education
is the most important," he says. "Enforcement can depend
on too many factors, including the lack of commitment of the enforcement
officer, who can become indifferent or even callous when confronted
with so many situations."
Dr
Brincat highlights the sterling work done by the NGOs and also
individuals in the field of animal welfare.
"Those
who work in the field of animal welfare are generally volunteers,
but there are so many who are not even in an organisation and
are fully committed," he says. "Luckily, television
has also had a positive, educational impact. People who watch
programmes about nature are influenced for the better. Sometimes
viewers are shocked to learn that animals have such tender sentiments
and instincts."
The
MLP deputy leader expresses his satisfaction that the recent RSPCA
International conference brought together so many organisations
catering for animal welfare.
"This
shows how we have moved ahead from the time when all the difficult
relationships between the groups were highlighted in letters in
the press," he says.
Dr
Brincat explains that in his speech at the conference, he placed
great emphasis on animal rights rather than welfare, believing
it is important to move people away from this mindset.
"Once
the concept of animal rights becomes entrenched, not in a constitution,
but in the minds of individuals, then animal welfare follows naturally,"
is his philosophy.
On
the subject of the new legislation planned, Dr Brincat says he
can only really comment on what the Labour party had proposed.
"On
the MLP side we presented a draft for public comments and there
were several NGOs who made their comments and suggestions,"
he says. "When the final draft was then approved internally,
we tried to include all possible suggestions compatible within
the framework of that legislation."
He
points out that animal welfare legislation is being updated in
all countries.
"The
Labour party followed the New Zealand law which was enacted at
the beginning of January last year," he explains. "The
European models, especially the German one, are equivalent in
several respects but there are always the differences that naturally
come from the commercial thinking and the humane thinking between
one legislation and another. That is why we opted for the New
Zealand legislation."
He
believes one important step that the MLP took was listing a number
of rights that belong to animals.
"There
was criticism from some that animals do not have rights,"
he says. "But the truth is that there are basic rights which
belong in principle to sentient living beings compatible with
their very nature."
|