|
sport
We have the potential to
do better next time
Mr Justice
Lino Farrugia Sacco, President of the Malta Olympic Committee
explained to RAY ABDILLA how all parties involved in the Small
Nations Games contributed to the astounding success of the Maltese
athletes. The athletes and coaches were extremely dedicated to
their sports disciplines both during the many months prior to
the Games and in San Marino. The Government is being far more
supportive than ever before and the effort by the various Federations
proved to be a fundamental contribution towards this overall success
in achieving so many medals by our athletes.
Did you ever
think that we were going to do so well in these Games?
Yes, although one is always afraid of being overly optimistic.
that he miscalculated somewhere. However, with the change of the
MOC administration, back in 1997, new professional concepts were
introduced to bring about better overall results. which meant
that success could be achieved although one cannot always guarantee
this.
A quick overview of past results shows that these were in fact
achieved. In the 1997 Small Nations Games, held in Iceland we
obtained the best overall results ever at the time. During the
same year, Malta also fared very well during the Mediterranean
Games in Bari. Two years later, in the Liechtenstein Small Nations
Games, we achieved the second best results ever. In the Mediterranean
Games in Bari in 1997 we obtained the best result ever in those
Games. All this made us hopeful for good results this year in
San Marino.
The Committee always referred to these Games as a stepping-stone
for the next Games to be held in Malta in 2003. Was that a fair
comment or a defensive one so the general public would not expect
too much but then praise our athletes for what they would finally
achieve?The Committee always considered these Games as a stepping-stone
for 2003, but never said that it did not expect good results.
We even specified where this was the case and specifically to
swimming where the athletes did not acquire the standards laid
down by the MOC and we still sent them on that basis. However
we always selected the best athletes and did not just bank on
the future. Naturally we always kept The Malta Games in mind.
What was the secret behind this success?
Hard work by all concerned. The athletes worked very hard and
nearly all of them should be praised for their efforts. The coaches
endeavoured to assist the athletes at all times. The Federations
were successful in their efforts.
The MOC provided medical services as well physiotherapists, nutritionists,
psychologists to support the athletes. Government helped financially,
whereas the IOC and EOC contributed when they realised we were
worthy of support. Sponsors were likewise important. The efforts
of the Directors of the MOC and the fact of having new headquarters
were also very important factors.
Was there a change of strategy to the previous Games?
There were modifications to the previous strategy. These were
mainly the Elite and Aspirants Schemes, a mixture that is good
for present and future athletes, as well as the fact that we cashed
on the modifications of the law introduced by Government on Citizenship
Laws.
The strategy also evolved around the advantages derived from the
modifications in the Maltese Citizenship Laws.
I believe that if we want international success we should concentrate
even more on those athletes who can land a Gold Medal.
Do you think schools are giving sports the support it needs or
is it still regarded as a 'waste of time'?
Sports is never a waste of time, however short the time allocated
to it. However, in most cases this is in now way enough. School
support counts a great deal and in fact, this can be seen from
which schools the majority of the athletes taking part in the
Games came from.
Very often, the amount of time allocated to sports is far too
limited. Certain schools emphasise more than others and this is
clearly evident as athletes taking part in such Games are often
from particular schools. When sports becomes more of an integral
part of the scholastic curriculum, the calibre of Maltese athletes
is bound to rise.
After doing so well at San Marino, everyone expects more in two
years time in Malta. Will it be more difficult to obtain
the same results or do you think that we could actually do better?
We certainly have the potential to do better and I hope that we
shall, for the first time ever, place fourth overall. This is
not easy to achieve. All concerned must give a greater contribution
with Government providing more funds. available if it wants us
to achieve more.
Are you getting enough help from the Government?
In sports, enough is a word that one can hardly use. Five years
ago, the financial assistance provided by Government was more
than doubled and this has been increased slightly though marginally
every year since then. 45 Federations are affiliated or recognised
by the MOC and the amount is definitely not sufficient to distribute
amongst all. However, we feel that Government is being far more
supportive than ever before.Besides the usual facilities, what
do you think sports needs in Malta and start making a name even
with the big guns?
Besides the obvious requirements, what else is required to make
Malta a country to be reckoned with in world sports?
More support is necessary from various fronts. The issue of more
financial backing has already been mentioned. Efforts have to
be made to ensure that sports is more firmly ingrained in our
culture. This could be achieved by setting up a school specialising
in sports, offering more University credits in sports and encouraging
both private and governmental enterprise to support athletes.
Funds, Government employees and perhaps some from the biggest
companies on the Island seconded to the MOC, a Sports culture
in the Country. University should give more credits to sports;
a school specialised in sports should come into existence. The
MOC should be involved in all major sports projects.
What about the change in a couple of sports disciplines that the
Games have imposed? Would it be possible to increase disciplines
instead of changing them? And have waterpolo and football ever
been considered for inclusion discussed with other countries and
organisers?
The MOC had to propose the 10 sports disciplines, bearing in mind
the Statutes of the Games, international support, local success,
chances of improvement, officiating teams, structure of Federations,
expenses involved. We cannot increase the number of sports disciplines,
as this has to be accepted by the International Executive. We
have again asked to increase the number of sports but we are still
finding opposition from the other countries. Regarding the change
in a couple of sports
disciplines, Bocci was on the verge of being cancelled in San
Marino, as there were not enough participants. The rules had to
be changed in order to make it possible to hold this event.
Waterpolo is not popular with most of the other seven nations.
When we tried to introduce football, back in 1993, we had a lot
of opposition from the IOC and from some of the participating
states.
What are your views about the foreigners, who represent
Malta in some disciplines? Do you think it is helping our sports
or hindering it?
If you are referring to the Maltese who live abroad, I do not
consider these
foreigners. We had only one non-Maltese participant who resides
in Malta real foreigner residing in Malta, who took part in these
Games. All the other countries have many foreigners.
We need to distinguish between participants who are foreigners
living in Malta and participants who are Maltese but living overseas.
In these last Games there were statistics. This is the case with
most participating countries and, in my opinion, the level of
sports seen at these Games is enhanced by this policy. Yes, certain
Maltese athletes, who also reside in Malta, were not chosen for
the Games due to the level of their performance.
We still lack some real winners in certain sports, such as swimming.
When one considers the improvement made in our sports facilities,
particularly in swimming, we did not achieve the results we were
expecting. What are your comments on this point?
I have still not solved the problem with swimming. When we attain
the necessary standards, we should possibly place with the top
three in the Games. In swimming, one athlete can win three or
four medals, possibly even gold, thus making all the difference
to our overall performance. I think that swimming is a very difficult
sport and certainly, it is more difficult to win in some of its
events than in others. Waterpolo could also be taking our best
athletes away as Waterpolo provides more money and glory than
Swimming. Since waterpolo provides more money and glory than swimming,
it tends to attract the more promising swimmers.
What was your biggest satisfaction at San Marino and what was
your greatest disappointment at the Games?
The biggest satisfaction is that we obtained the best result ever
and won the highest number of Gold Medals and also the highest
number of medals overall - 35. The greatest disappointment was
seeing Jack Schiavone injured during an accident in the Cycling
Race. Jack is a very dedicated athlete from a very hardworking
Federation. It made me sad to see all those efforts wasted due
to an accident. I am sure Jack will achieve success soon in some
other important tournament.
Who do you think are the athletes for the future? Besides doing
well at the Games of Small States of Europe, are there any Maltese
athletes who can make a name for themselves in competitions such
as the Olympic Games?
The level of the Olympic Games is very high and it will be difficult
to achieve success there. But we should keep it in mind. We should
not rule it out and one way to achieve some success may be to
identify one or two youngsters and concentrate our efforts on
them. My concern would be how to select the discipline since all
Federations and athletes would like to compete in such an event.
This is not easy as all the other Federations and athletes will
not like it. So the only way is to be sure of success before implementing
it.
What will happen between today and two years time, committee wise?
Will there be any changes in tactics or will other coaches be
lured to Malta for the good of our athletes?
In preparation for the Malta Games, what other tactics is the
MOC considering to improve the standard of our athletes? Is employing
foreign coaches an option?
Change is always necessary. We must not be complacent in our success.
Discussions with the various Federations are already underway
to determine our current position and how we can improve on it.
We shall certainly discuss with the Federations how to improve
our standards especially changing some of the older athletes and
some of the Coaches. One has to take stock of the situation and
not be happy with the present success and do nothing to improve
it.
|