|
opinion
A relaxed affair?
Franklin
Mamo continues to share notes from his diary
on a barbecue
experience
Been to one
of the many barbecues contributing to that patch of light all
along our coast and which is probably visible from outer space.
A quintessentially summer institution originally practiced by
English and French pirates on some Carribean island in the evening
after a hard day pillaging, burning and generally creating mayhem
in Spanish towns in South America. It was a relaxed affair: you
lie on the sand of a silvery beach while someone cooks meat over
an open fire. No frills, no complications and to make sure that
there is nothing to labour the mind about, barbecues were held
after sunset so that you wouldnt bother whether the stuff
you were eating was overcooked or undercooked. Or pork or Spaniard,
for that matter.
Transferred
locally, the barbeque had to undergo some fundamental modifications.
It had to be adapted to local leisure habits where, it seems,
leisure time has to be more stressful than working time. Getting
there is already part of the game: you drive through massive traffic
jams and then try to find parking space which hopefully is not
too far from your destination that little patch of clear
sand where to set up camp. After all you have to take down:
(a) a petrol-fired
generator,
(b) neon,
gas and electric lights and torches
(c) barbecue
set and paraphernalia, chip pan, water cooler, thermos and humungous
picnic cooler (preferably canary yellow so that fishermen lost
at sea can use it as a landmark to find their way home)
(d) plastic
furniture (i.e. chairs, table, etc.) that folds (preferably accompanied
by instruction manual showing how something so small it could
fit in your pocket can be transformed into a fully fledged dining
room minus walls and ceiling)
(e) portable
TV, to wind down after a days work by keeping up-to-date
with the latest conflicts in the Middle East,
(f) inflatables
to help keep afloat at sea (e.g. Ninja Turtles, Pokemons, variety
of flora and fauna), a ball is also mandatory so that children
can irritate people at the neighbouring barbeque,
(g) enough
food to feed the Third World, enough meat to rival McDonalds
(h) hi-fi
system with 200W speakers, equalizer, mixer, automatic balancing,
CD collection (sing-along reggae tunes)
This list
is, of course, not exhaustive. But, in a nutshell, its "take
the kitchen to the beach". And just as the kitchen is the
hub of homely activity the barbecue is no longer meant to be a
laid-back affair. Activities (especially the eating part) have
to be hurried, just as happens in your kitchen at home.
Recently
the Department of Civil Protections issued some safety warnings
on taming the flames. Quite appropriately, seeing that the number
of incidents from too much haste has been going up, usually resulting
from flammable liquids being poured into the barbeque fire. Summertime
and the living is easy, but skip the formalities and hurry things
up.
("Whaaat?!
We have to wait until the fire gets going? We have to wait until
the whole thing is aflame? We have to wait until the fire dies
down? Just pour in some petrol and put the sausages on")
No wonder
the frankfurters tasted of car exhaust fumes.
There were
only some two dozen people for the protests when President Zemin
of China was in Malta. In other times it could have been different.
Long, long, ago when I was still in Secondary School we had a
religion teacher who taught us all about the evils of communism.
I remember we would be given leaflets published by the "Douglas
Hyde Foundation" telling us about the cruelties practiced
by the Asian Reds and suggesting that people boycott products
from PR China one of them being, for some reason, luncheon meat.
I remember I would feel a twinge of guilt seeing yet another can
of "Ma Ling" at home.
Whatever
happened to those people who were so strongly activist then, I
do not know. So now, presumably, I can eat luncheon meat made
in PR China without any remorse. Maybe the fact that it is being
produced under the conditions of the free market makes it OK.
Communism was bad, it seems, because it involved economic centralisation
and not because it is politically repressive.
|