|
I
POLL RESULT
|
|
Should Malta form part of a US-led military retaliation
against terrorism?
|
|
YES 66%
|
|
NO 34%
|
|
|
|
I
POLL
The iPoll is a synergy between Malta Today,
the Internet and you the readers.
Every
week the web sites www.maltatoday.com.mt and www.maltamag.com
will feature an opinion poll on a particular issue. The results
of this Internet poll will then be published in Malta Today the
following Sunday along with opinion articles arguing both sides
of the case.
If
you do not have Internet, you can use the coupon on this page
to vote in next weeks poll. People who send in the attached
coupon with their voting preference will automatically participate
in a competition. One lucky participant will be put into a draw
for a chance to win a flight to Prague.
Todays
issue concerns the dramatic moments we are living through at present.
Almost two weeks after the attacks in New York and Washington
the world is bracing itself for a new conflict. America has declared
a new war and in the past days we have seen military
manoeuvres in preparation for retaliatory strikes. The US has
also embarked on a diplomatic effort to forge a broad coalition
in support of its fight against terrorism. Different countries
have been voicing their support for the military effort. What
role should neutral Malta play? Is this somebody elses war?
How can Malta participate in this coalition?
We
asked a former US embassy media officer his opinion on what role
Malta should play in the fight against terrorism, if any.
What part for Malta in a new war?
By Joe Mercieca
The terrorist
strike against the United States on September 11 killed over 6,000
innocent people from 62 different nations. It was not merely a
barbaric strike at the US but a heinous crime against humanity.
The repercussions
of the event and very possible further terrorist acts of aggression
in the future, will once again expose the intrinsic immorality
of the concept of neutrality. Malta, like every other country,
has come one step closer to the time when it will have to choose
between saying that it wants to stay on the fence preaching peace
and pontificating on Quixotic bridges between two continents,
or stand up to be counted.
History has
repeatedly shown that neutrality may be convenient for a time,
albeit at a sovereign and heinous price, but untenable when put
on test. Those who play Pontius Pilate for ideological reasons,
mercenary convenience or repayment for past services received,
will one day find they too are prey to predators. Terrorism has
in the past been shown to have no respect for the so-called neutral
states. The massacre at the OPEC meeting in Vienna and the downing
of a Swissair passenger jet in the mid-1970s are two of the many
episodes which prove the point.
It is too
early to say to what extent Malta should participate in the long-drawn
fight against terrorism. The declarations made in Parliament by
the Prime Minister and the response, albeit with prima facie
reasonable caveats by the Leader of the Opposition, are a good
start.
The question
of whether Malta should or should not accept its strategic facilities
being used for direct military action is at this stage hypothetical.
With the Sigonella airbase only 90 miles away, as the crow flies
and 12 other bases in Italy alone, the United States or conceivably
a United Nations force have no need for Malta's facilities. The
fact that India, a prominent member of the defunct and superfluous
non-aligned movement has made its bases available to America is
significant.
But Sigonella
is and will remain a target in many scenarios. And Malta has to
ensure that terrorists do not use our island as a springboard
against it. At this stage Malta can and has the moral duty to
contribute to the war against terrorism. For starters Malta could
start by doing those things which, unless leaked by irresponsible
persons including existing moles in the police force, can be done
without supplying fodder for those who have a dirty agenda or
those who are willing to barter their soul for pecuniary profit
by scoring a headline here or overseas. One sensationalist news
item can ruin this country.
As things
stand when putting these words to paper one should expect Malta
to honour its moral and political obligations by taking a pro-active
role in diplomatic efforts aimed at defeating terrorism with the
least collateral damage. Malta could give access to silent terrorist
hunters; share intelligence and establish a reputation for security.
It should also be watchful on movements to and from countries
which have a blemished record. One has to remember that diplomacy
has an elephant's memory and a number of unsavoury cases linking
Malta with terrorism in the past can raise doubts among the anti-terrorism
fighters but also temptations among perpetrators of terrorism.
In the long
term, Malta has to bear in mind that it cannot continue to play
ostrich and expect assistance when one day it could need help.
And that time will come. In the meantime one yearns to see whether
Switzerland will freeze Bin Laden's huge assets in Swiss banks.
Nor would it be futile to investigate whether his bloodstained
millions of dollars are floating in some Malta registered financial
operation.Mr Mercieca is a lecturer in journalism at the University
of Malta and a former US embassy media officer.
|