Letters to the Editor should be
concise.
No
pen names are accepted.
Send your letters to:
The
Editor
MaltaToday
Network House, Vjal ir-Rihan
San Gwann SGN 02
Malta
or by:
tel: ++356 382741
fax: ++356 385075
e-mail
|
On bouncers and their traits
From
Emmanuel Busuttil
It is with a sense of apprehension that as the weekend approaches
parents watch their teenage children put on their finest brand
of clothes for another night-out at Paceville. This apprehension
stems from the fact that violence is a never-ending problem in
this area (arena!) of entertainment. Mismanagement and improper
manpower may lead to excessive trouble and violent attitudes.
As reported in local papers, this seems to be the trait among
several Macho Bouncers that seem to profligate this area.
Who is really responsible for the behaviour of Bouncers?
From time to time we read and hear about incidents between bouncers
and customers The most recent case as reported in your paper (01.12.01)
involved four young foreign students who were beaten up for no
apparent reason. As a consequence they had to receive medical
treatment at hospital.
What does the job of a Bouncer entail?
This is a very delicate job, which should be backed by professional
training. Bouncers deal with different characters, often under
the influence of alcohol, especially in the small hours of the
night. Dealing properly with such characters means thinking with
your brain not with your fists.
Bouncers have to spend long hours in a difficult environment,
but still have to show proficiency. Specialised and psychological
training for different circumstances and environment should be
provided for people working in this type of work.
Not everyone is suited for this work. Their main responsibility
is to protect the customers and ascertain that they enjoy themselves
in a violence-free environment. The Tough guy mentality
is a totally unacceptable perception. Bouncers are there to prevent
trouble, not cause it.
It is opportune to mention that it is clearly stipulated in the
Laws of Malta (Local Wardens and Security Guards Act, art.329),
that people employed to perform in these duties must be in possession
of a Warrant issued by the Police Commissioner.
So far there is no real accountability since there is no real
list of who these people are. It seems that Bouncers are employed
on the merit of their physical appearance and/or knowledge of
martial arts. There is also the perception that Bouncers are often
strong with the weak, and weak with the strong.
Have the competent authorities ever checked on the conditions
of work of these Bouncers, and if they are being employed according
to the Employment Act?
Their job demands that the competent authorities tackle the issue
immediately and seriously to ensure that the law is being complied
with. Accountability should lead to a higher level of liaison
with the competent authorities.
Clarifications
on AZZURAir
From
Philip Manduca, R Frendo Randon and Associates
For ERGOM Spa. MATERIE PLASTICHE
We
refer to the articles published last August in various Newspapers
(It-Torca, Kulhadd and MaltaToday) in relation to the financial
crisis of AZZURAir. AirMalta owns 49% of AZZURAir and the EGROM
MATERIE PLASTICHE SpA (Ergom) owns 27.90%.
On
behalf of the EGROM we would like to clarify the issue as follows:
AZZURAir
is managed by Maltese personnel seconded to the Company by Air
Malta plc (the CEO is Maltese and 4 members of the Board of Directors
and other managers are Maltese).
Since
starting operations, AZZURAir has unfortunately accumulated heavy
losses. Indeed, except for the year 1999 a year in which AZZURAir
made a small profit, from 1998 to 2000 losses have been considerable.
Due to significant losses the shareholders, including Air Malta,
were compelled to invest considerable amounts to keep the company
afloat.
As
a consequence of the disastrous financial results of the year
2000, causing a loss of more than the company's entire capital,
all the shareholders have been forced to invest more money to
avoid winding-up of the Company. According to the Italian Law
if the shareholders did not cover the losses and subscribe the
new capital the company would have had to be wound up.
To
date ERGOM Group is still waiting for a credible business plan
aimed to ensure the future of the company particularly in the
present crisis in the field of aviation. No such plan has been
discussed with the shareholders. ERGOM Group questions the viability
of further investment by the shareholders of the company (Air
Malta included) when there is no credible business plan.
Concern
about the SPCA
From
Sharon Camilleri
Kent,
UKAre any figures available, from the S.P.C.A. in Floriana, regarding
the number of dogs that have been put down since the departure
of Mary Shephard as Executive Secretary.
Ms Shephard was openly in favour of neutering rather than destroying
abandoned animals, in line with the policy advocated by animal
groups such as the R.S.P.C.A. and the Cats Protection league in
the U.K., where all animals to be homed are neutered as a matter
of course. One cannot help but worry that the removal of Ms Shephard
might be the first step toward introducing, via a back door,
the collect and kill policy she was opposed to.
Good
news for animal lovers
From
Michael Pearson, Chairman, World Animal Conscience
"Circus
promoters CJ Productions Ltd said they would no longer bring circuses
with animal acts to Malta.
We
are greatly heartened by the statement of Leo & Johann Said.
This decision should be applauded by all of those campaigning
for the Rights of Animals. In particular those involved in this
years campaign, Azzzjoni Pozittivi, GLUE, Moviment Graffiti, World
Animal Conscience and many individuals. Their effort in bringing
the issues to the attention of the public and organisers has achieved
a decision that will send a positive message about Animal Rights
in Malta. It is of course regretted that there were injuries and
violence at the protest; we all however remain committed to peaceful
protesting.
We
urge the responsible authorities, to use the new Animal Welfare
Legislation to formalise a ban on the use of animals in entertainment,
to ensure that in the future no entrepreneur is tempted to take
over from CJ Productions and step back into the promotion of Animal
Circuses.
In
the spirit of goodwill, we commend the decision of Leo & Johann
Said, and wish them every success in the future with the promotion
of their business without the exploitation of animals."
|