news
Housing
Authority slammed for lacking commitment
Two weeks after this newspaper highlighted their plight, residents
in Valletta are still waiting for the Housing Authority to follow
up on their application for the installation of an elevator in
the government apartments under Scheme V. The original application
had been submitted together with a deposit of Lm20 per
block two years ago.
Asked to comment, Stefan Buontempo, spokesman for the Campaign
for Social Housing Justice, told MaltaToday that the Housing Authority
had to show more commitment when organising these kind of schemes.
"One has to bear in mind that most of the residents in
the city are pensioners, which renders the installation of elevators
a necessity rather than a mere luxury," he said.
Dr Buontempo further explained that while the existent Housing
Authority policy whereby apartments with disabled people living
in them were given preference was admirable, it was unwittingly
giving rise to discrimination against other residents.
"Other people might not be suffering from a disability
but are in equal need of assistance," he said.
He described the problem of lift installation as being "graver
than it sounds".
"It is not really a matter of luxury or convenience, as
some people seem to think," he said. "Valletta has an
ageing population, most of the residents accepted these government
apartments a long time ago when they were much younger. Today
they are in their sixties and those living in the higher stories
face a problem of mobility that they didnt anticipate."
Alfred Portelli, who was minister for housing during the Labour
administration, explained that the lifts installation scheme had
been introduced by the Labour government in 1996.
"In the two years that Labour was in government the ministry
had already identified which buildings were most in need of an
elevator and where it was possible to install them," he said.
"I cannot understand the delay on the part of the Housing
Authority in pushing the scheme forward.
Why did years have to elapse before the first elevator was installed?
And why are more years being allowed to pass before the rest of
the applications are followed through? The Housing Authority should
answer these questions for the sake of those people who are most
in need of this facility, i.e. the many elderly who live in Valletta."
He added that had Labour continued in government the project
would have been completed by now. Proof of this, he stated, lies
in the amount of groundwork which the Housing Authority under
the Labour administration had managed to finish within two years.
"We had identified some 500 government buildings in Malta
and Gozo which could potentially take the installation of elevators.
I still remember the hassle we went through in the Tac-Cawla area
in Gozo, where at first it appeared installing the lift would
be impossible due to the way the building was constructed. But
then we found a way around that one as well," Mr Portelli
concluded.
Dr Jean-Pierre Farrugia, Nationalist MP on the Valletta district,
stressed that there were many considerations to take into account
when discussing the lift issue.
"First and foremost, the residents have to realise that
applying under the scheme does not automatically mean that the
elevator will be installed," he said. "There are many
buildings which cannot take the installation, mainly due to the
way they were constructed. For instance, there is one particular
case in Old Bakery Street where the apartments yard belongs
to a third party. This means that before proceeding with the installation
the Housing Authority must buy this third partys property
and go through a series of other bureaucratic hassles. These things
naturally lead to delays."
Dr Farrugia added that delays had also been caused by the fact
that the tenders were all awarded to the company with the cheapest
bid, which meant that the same contractor was working on all the
installations.
"The contractor probably does not have the manpower to
cope with all the tenders," he said. "I believe there
are some 18 installations being carried out at the moment. Maybe
sub-contracting is an option. Or else, we simply have to face
the fact that the cheapest bid is not always the most advantageous."
|