|
Letters
December 14 2003
MEPA and the Victoria Lines
Sylvana
Debono
PRO MEPA
Floriana
I refer to your articles published on the 23rd November 2003
and 7th December 2003, and would like to make the following points.
The two speakers for the NGOs as quoted in your paper impute
that the granting of the building permit is tantamount to sanctioning
the demolition of the Victoria Lines. MEPA scheduled the Victoria
Lines as a Grade 1 national monument with a buffer zone, and as
an Area of High Landscape Value as per Government Notice Number
85/01 dated 23 January 2001. The wall in question is within the
buffer zone of over 100 meters and therefore afforded automatic
protection. MEPA has never issued permits for the demolition of
the Victoria Lines. In the pertinent case the permit conditioned
the applicant to restore the wall and not to demolish it. Any
demolition or theft of stones from the Victoria Lines is an illicit
act.
Additionally, the scheduling of the Victoria Lines includes a
buffer zone of over a hundred meters and not a meager ten meters
as suggested by the NGOs. Given the densely developed character
of Malta this buffer zone extends over already developed areas
or sites within a development scheme. The buffer zone ensures
that development proposals within schemes create the least impact
on the heritage assets, and where possible heritage gains are
requested for the eventual restoration of the Victoria Lines.
In areas outside development schemes the buffer zone ensures that
development is restricted to acceptable agricultural purposes
and still controls any impacts on the heritage assets. Therefore,
one has to remember that the MEPA is obliged by law to consider
development applications within the approved schemes.
The article raises the issue of the fortified wall, which connects
Fort Madliena to the Victoria Lines. This wall was not initially
identified as part of the Victoria Lines as studies concentrated
on the forts and the main line of the defensive system. Nonetheless,
once the wall was assessed by heritage experts it was confirmed
as being part of the intricate system of the Victoria Lines. In
October 2000 part of the wall in question was dismantled and the
stones taken away by someone who is not the present owner of the
site. Immediately, the MEPA issued an enforcement notice against
the owner who purchased the property from the Lands Department.
In the mean time the site was resold twice. MEPA officials managed
to trace the location of the original stones and retrieved them
for the eventual restoration of the wall in question with the
assistance of the present owner of the site.
MEPA ensures that what survives of the Victoria Lines, including
any ancillary features, is protected both legally and physically.
On the other hand, MEPA is also obliged to provide for development
requirements according to the Development Planning Act and development
schemes approved by Parliament in 1988. In this particular case,
once the heritage value of the wall in question was established,
MEPA guaranteed the conservation and restoration of the same wall,
while it honored the proposal for development as long as this
took place within the approved development scheme, and provided
that no damage is caused to the historic features. The pertinent
wall flanks one side of the property destined for development,
and curves slightly into the site. The design of the development
is such that the wall is conserved and development takes place
where there are no heritage assets. Through positive intervention
the MEPA together with the applicant and the architect agreed
on a strategy for the eventual re-construction of the dismantled
parts of the historic wall using the retrieved stolen original
masonry, and for the restoration of other parts of the wall which
collapsed due to decay and neglect. The applicant was also charged
a bank guarantee of Lm15, 000 to ensure compliance with permit
conditions for MEPA officials to monitor the construction and
the restoration works, thus ensuring that the historic wall is
safeguarded. It was also agreed that any engineering works should
take place before the restoration commences to prevent damage
to the newly restored wall. Subsequently, the restoration of the
wall should take place according to an approved restoration method
statement. The Lm15, 000 bank guarantee is released only on completion
of the restoration of the wall to the satisfaction of the MEPA
and heritage experts it consults. This is still the case and MEPA
is carrying out spot inspections several times a week to ensure
compliance. Works were stopped last Friday as soon as MEPA received
information that excavation works were being carried out. MEPA
officials had been on site only the day before. Work on the site
has been halted pending further supervision and both the architect
and the owner have been notified.
Finally, it was only through the MEPA's initiative and outreach
that a number of heritage gains were obtained from developers
for the restoration of parts of the Victoria Lines. It was also
the MEPA who created opportunities for the active participation
of the NGOs in the restoration programmes of the Victoria Lines.
Such initiatives should be given due recognition.
|