|
Editorial
December 21 2003
Perhaps a softer, more subtle Austin Gatt 
Dr
Austin Gatt is not a useless minister. He is a capable no nonsense
minister with a deep-rooted appreciation that words have an expiry
date as do the actions that follow. Yet, in the case of both PBS
and his commentary on the running of Government-owned companies,
he has been over indulgent in the use of words.
The proposal for example that the newsroom at Television Malta
can survive with four or five people is ludicrous and downright
banal.
Comparing TVM to NET is silly, considering that NET has lost so
much money. So is the proposal that everything at PBS is to be
farmed out.
If Malta is to choose between spending one million on an embassy
abroad with forty bubbling staff members and offering a public
radio and television service
then undoubtedly it has to be
a public audiovisual service. If Malta is to choose between attending
every single EU conference and seminar and sponsoring culture
on radio and TV then it has to be the latter.
Yet, Dr Gatts unforgettable piece was his parliamentary
outburst on the performance of government companies. His comments
contribute in a very big way in painting dark blotches over the
so-called exploits of former Minister Josef Bonnici.
Minister Gatt listed a whole load of facts on how EneMalta, Air
Malta and Maltacom had exceeded the boundaries of normality. He
quoted directors fees without mentioning names. But the
names are known to all. He cited as an example the salary of Louis
Grech without mentioning the mans name. Mr Grech, an MLP
candidate for the European Parliament elections is reported to
have received a yearly salary of Lm56,000 as Air Malta chairman.
This newspaper asked Minister Gatt this very week for a breakdown
of Mr Grechs salary but our Gozo-born minister suggests
we ask Air Malta for the details. This is undeniably a silly way
of treating the press after such high-profile regurgitation spewed
onto Mr Grech.
Dr Gatt, if we are to believe him, quotes uncollected monies at
EneMalta amounting to Lm44 million. His diatribe continues to
add more nasty adjectives to the administrative prowess of former
Economic Services minister Josef Bonnici. If only the Nationalist
Party had a Vigilance and Discipline board just like the MLP,
Minister Gatt could have easily been tried for extending ridicule
on his former cabinet colleague. More so since Minister Gatt was
there when it all happened.
And that brings us to the question of collective responsibility.
The PN party machine vents many perceptions. When it suits it,
the idea of collective responsibility is utilised
and quoted at all times. Some ministers are given all the press
they need and others are side-tracked. When it does not, decisions
are redirected to individual ministers to avoid spreading the
muck around.
Prof Josef Bonnici may not have been the most up-and-coming of
cabinet ministers. The electorate saw this during the last election.
But he is certainly not wholly to blame for the ailments in his
former department.
The decision on the salary of Mr Louis Grech was certainly known
to everyone including the Prime Minister, so why all the fuss
now? And what about the other chairmen at Air Malta before Mr
Grech? Were they too on the recently reported miserly remuneration
of Lm7,000 that is apparently paid to current Air Malta chairman
Lawrence Zammit?
Dr Gatt has much to offer in Government especially when it comes
to changes and reform. But he must tread carefully. In reforming
PBS he must appreciate that the commercial aspect must not reign
supreme. Dr Gatt - you should reform PBS but dont destroy
the role of public broadcasting.
When it comes to the parastatal companies, he has all the support
he can dream of from this newspaper and the public in general.
But he should go about his major surgery with the full knowledge
that in this particular case all the fingers of blame are pointing
in one direction and the address reads: 16 years of Nationalist
government.
|