|
National
Bank Scandal December 21 2003
Death in Parliament the Mintoff law which killed the NBM
Back
in the forties and fifties, as an upcoming politician armed with
debilitating charisma and fine oratory skills, the Rhodes scholar
from Bormla often encountered Anthony Cassar Torregiani, the founder
of the National Bank of Malta, in Kingsway (now Republic Street,
Valletta).
"One day I will take your bank, Sur Cassar Torregiani,"
the young Mintoff would say.
On the night of Monday, 10 December 1973, Prime Minister Dom Mintoff
announced that the National Bank of Malta (NBM) management had
offered government to take over the bank. Nothing could have been
further away from the truth. Mintoffs socialism had turned
into the menacing streak of state capitalism with an iron fist.
Earlier on during that fateful day, throughout a heated meeting
with NBM president Louis Vella and other directors, Mintoff had
laid down the line, saying he wanted the bank by 5.30pm, and that
he wanted all shareholders to transfer their shares to the government
"naturally without compensation."
That same evening in Parliament, Mintoff claimed that 50 per cent
of shareholders had already signed away their shares to the government.
After having threatened the NBM directors that he would have the
countrys parastatal companies withdraw their monies from
the NBM deposit accounts, he told the directors that the shareholders
would have to transfer their shares to the government without
compensation.
A feverish telephone campaign to inform shareholders of Mintoffs
demands created general alarm as shareholders feared Mintoff would
pass a law to remove their limited liability and make them personally
responsible for any deficit in the bank. But the National Bank
of Malta had strong financial foundations, as the accounts of
its final year would prove. The directors and shareholders would
realise only later how the Mintoff administration managed to create
an implausible and risible economic exercise to render the NBM
bankrupt.
Mintoffs plan of forced nationalisation, the
kind which required coercion and threats, was rumbling in action.
On 10 December, 1973, he sent the directors of the NBM packing,
warning them to have the shareholders ready to hand over their
shares. That same night he told Parliament that the directors
had offered the National Bank of Malta to Government for free.
Within two days, Mintoffs oratory managed to woo the Nationalists
into approving an urgent bill to take over the NBM, with the dubious
claim that he had already acquired fifty per cent of the NBM shares.
But by law, Mintoff had to have two-thirds of the shares: concurrent
to his rush efforts to have Parliament approve the bill to take
over the NBM, the Courts were rushing to take over the substantial
shareholding of Count Alfred Sant Fournier and of the Marquis
John Scicluna. These shares were administered by Adrian Busietta
and Philip Attard Montalto for Sant Fournier, and Baron Patrick
Scicluna and Alfred Delia for the heirs of the Marquis.
10 December 1973
(Human Rights Day)
Tension, threats and general panic: on Monday, 10 December at
the OPM, Mintoff was busy at work coercing the NBM management
bank president Louis Vella and general manager Henry Micallef
to accede to his requests and hand over the National Bank
of Malta to the government.
The unexplained run on the bank, now faced with heavy withdrawals
amounting to Lm1.2 million within just four days, put the NBM
directors in a quandary. They are faced with Mintoffs wrath
he wants the bank by 6pm that same day. They consider declaring
bankruptcy and proceeding with liquidation, a process that would
freeze depositor accounts for an indefinite period of time.
In no dissimilar terms, Mintoffs demands hark back to the
BICAL crisis, when messenger Karmenu Mifsud Bonnici laid down
his masters line for Cecil Pace give half your banks
assets to Mintoffs nominees, or face liquidation. The testing
ground for BICAL had revealed fruitful for Mintoffs nationalisation
furore.
In conference with the NBM management that day, the Labour premier
declared his intentions to seize the bank. He refused to have
the Central Bank offer bridging finance after the NBM asked for
stand-by finance against a collateral of Lm22 million
in loans, covered by hypothecs and insurance; he refused to have
the bank obtain Lm3 million in finance from Midland Bank and National
Westminster Bank.
That evening the NBM delegation also spoke to Attorney General
Edgar Mizzi, to ask him to be able to consult with foreign banks,
such as Barclays Bank, which had already offered the bank bridging
finance. Mizzi told the NBM management, according to Philip Attard
Montaltos Court evidence, "Dak digà belaghha
l-pillola." (He has already swallowed the pill) an
indication of Mintoffs future takeover of Barclays Bank
(later to become Mid-Med Bank).
Mintoff said he would instruct all parastatal companies to withdraw
their monies from the NBM, and have a long queue of their vans
parade through Republic Street with some Lm4 million in parastatal
holdings. He told bank president Louis Vella that if he (Mintoff)
withdrew his money from the bank, everybody would follow suit,
and that the bank would have to close down. "Jekk nigbed
flusi jien, intkhom issubu ruhkom maghluqa fi zmien saghtejn"
(If I withdraw my money, you will find yourselves closed within
two hours).
The most notorious of threats was that he would abrogate shareholders
limited liability so that the banks liabilities would have
to be paid off from the personal wealth of the shareholders, "sa
l-ahhar bicca kandelabru jigi konfiskat" (right down to the
last piece of candlestick will be confiscated).
A second NBM delegation met Mintoff at 5.30pm, composed of vice-president
Philip Attard Montalto vice-president Austin Cassar Torregiani,
Baron Patrick Scicluna, Henry Micallef and legal adviser Prof
Felice Cremona. But there was no solution in sight. Mintoff had
drafted a legal instrument to have all shares transferred to the
government, and declared his absolutist intentions:
"Ill either pass a law to appoint a Council of Administration
to take care of the banking groups assets and liabilities,
or else I will pass a law to remove the limited liability of all
the shareholders." (
jew nghaddi ligi biex inqabbad
Council of Administration biex jiehu hsieb l-assets and liabilities
tal-banking group, inkella nghaddi ligi biex inehhi l-limited
liability tax-shareholders kollha.)
"I know this is against the Constitution, I dont give
a damn about the Constitution, was it not I that wrote it, I dont
give a damn about the judges and anybody." (Naf li din hija
kontra l-Kostituzzjoni, jiena nitnejjek mill-Kostituzzjoni, mhux
jien ghamiltha, nitnejjek mill-Imhallfin u minn kullhadd.").
Parliament Mintoff weaves his tale
On the evening of 10 December 1973, Mintoff announced in Parliament
that the NBM management had suggested that the government take
over the bank, "naturally without compensation," The
Times reported the day after.
He said the board of directors had met in the evening to tell
their shareholders "that in the circumstances and in the
interest of depositors
they were prepared to divest themselves
of their share capital and reserves to guarantee the bank and
to hand over the bank to the government."
Mintoff claimed that 50 per cent of NBM shareholders had signed
their acceptance of the recommendation of their board and he was
assured that within one or two days the required two thirds of
the shareholders would give their consent.
Mintoffs oratory spun his tale of lies: he said that two
weeks before, the government had drawn the attention of the NBM
to rumours which could be harmful to the bank. He said that parastatal
bodies had informed the government that they wished to withdraw
their monies due to the rumours, but that he had told them not
to panic "because if all depositors withdrew their money
simultaneously any bank, no matter how strong, would be broken.
He said he had told the NBM that they would advise parastatal
companies not to withdraw their monies.
After having disallowed the NBM from borrowing bridging finance
from Barclays Bank Malta, Mintoff would say the government was
already negotiating with Barclays Bank to set up another commercial
bank in which the government would have a 60 per cent majority
shareholding with a capital of Lm3 million. "The new company
would, when the National Bank of Malta shareholders agreed to
transfer the bank to the government without compensation, take
over the bank." Mintoff said Barclays Bank in London had
also given their assent.
The announcement caused havoc: Mintoffs statement urged
more depositors to withdraw their money from the NBM. The next
day, as withdrawals escalated to a new high, even higher than
those of the week before, Mintoff appeared on television to tell
depositors not to panic. He said that on the advice of the Central
Bank, the NBM was to suspend its activities as from Wednesday,
12 December. "A cooling off period was required for depositors
to calm down and for the government to see what can best be done
in the interests of all concerned," Mintoff announced. Mintoff
described the situation as having arisen from an unjustified run
on the bank and urged depositors not to panic.
But his statement had already had its catastrophic effects. The
morning after that Mintoff announced the NBM takeover, over Lm1.3
million in withdrawals were effected from the bank, a higher amount
than the Lm1.2 million that had already been withdraw the week
before when the bank was still under private administration. As
claimed in an affidavit by former NBM director Adrian Busietta,
"this hijack directed by Mr Mintoff produced a record withdrawal
from a Maltese bank and will long be remembered as a banking debacle."
It seemed that Mintoff had planned his attack on the NBM well:
when German bombers demolished the buildings of the Anglo-Maltese
Bank and the Bank of Malta in 1941, Anthony Cassar Torregiani
housed the two banks in his house for months until merging them
into the National Bank of Malta in 1946. Mintoff had managed to
destroy the spirit and heart of private banking within days.
|