Back
Register for SMS Alerts
or enter your details manually below...
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Password:
Hometown:
Birthday:
Sorry, we couldn't find that email.
Existing users
Email
Password
Sorry, we couldn't find those details.
Enter Email
Sorry, we couldn't find that email.

Hamrun multi-storey approved as being according to local plan

A development planning application contemplating the demolition of a two-storey building, retaining its façade, followed by the construction of a five-storey block was turned down by the Planning Commission

robert_musumeci
Robert Musumeci
16 June 2017, 7:30am
The applicant’s premises are situated in Triq il-Kbira San Guzepp, Hamrun
The applicant’s premises are situated in Triq il-Kbira San Guzepp, Hamrun
A development planning application contemplating the demolition of a two-storey building, retaining its façade, followed by the construction of a five-storey block was turned down by the Planning Commission. In fact, the proposed drawings show a four-storey building with a receded topmost floor. The applicant’s premises are situated in Triq il-Kbira San Guzepp, Hamrun.

To justify its decision, the Commission observed that the proposed building envelope ran counter to Urban Objective 2.3 of the Strategic Plan for Environment and Development (SPED) which promotes “a context driven approach for the control of building heights within Urban Conservation Areas in order to protect the traditional urban skyline”. Consequently, the proposal could not be justified on the basis of similar commitment in the immediate vicinity.

As a reaction, the applicant filed an appeal before the Environment and Planning Review Tribunal, insisting that the Commission’s decision should be reversed. The applicant argued that the Commission applied the wrong policy since his application was submitted prior to the introduction of the 2015 Policy and Design Guidelines. In his submissions, applicant stated that the Commission failed to note that the 2015 guidelines provide a specific transitory provision on the basis of which, applicants may request the Authority to assess their applications in terms of the previous 2007 Policy and Design Guidelines.

According to the applicant, the Authority should have ignored the provisions of the Strategic Plan for Environment and Development and, instead, relied on the 1992 Structure Plan on which basis, the 2007 guidelines were grounded. The applicant further pointed out that the street was, in any case, committed with tall buildings despite the Authority having given a different impression. 

In reply, the Authority took strong objection to the applicant’s arguments. The case officer insisted that the application was validated on 4th November, 2015, on which date the SPED had been approved since August 2015. Consequently, the applicant was wrong to assert that the SPED was not applicable in the given circumstances.

In addition, the case officer reminded the Tribunal that the premises was sandwiched between a three-storey building on the right and a two-storey building on the other end. Were it to be approved, the proposed development would have resulted in the creation of unsightly high blank party walls to the detriment of the low lying streetscape

In its assessment, the Tribunal immediately observed that as a matter of legal principle, “the application of policies and proposals in approved Subsidiary Plans should not prejudice the implementation of SPED.” In other words policy UO2.3 of the SPED, which was designed “to improve the townscape and environment in historic cores and their setting with a presumption against demolition of property worthy of conservation by adopting a context driven approach to the control of building heights within Urban Conservation Areas (UCAs)”, was certainly applicable.

Nevertheless, the Tribunal noted that the Hamrun Local Plan equally provides that within UCAs, the designated building height limitations as indicated in the Building Height Limitations Maps do “reflect the predominant height of the existing buildings”. In this case, the proposal was consonant with the set height limitations, which allow for a building height of four storeys and an overlying receded floor. The Tribunal therefore observed that applicant’s proposal was in line with policy and should be approved.

Dr Robert Musumeci is an advocate and a perit with an interest in development planning law

robert_musumeci
Dr Robert Musumeci is a warranted advocate and a perit. He also holds a Masters Degree in ...
Latest Environment News
19:05
Valletta found no difficulty against Tarxien as they secured a comfortable 6-0 win over the Rainbows.
16:54
Ħamrun Spartans returned to winning ways with a 3-1 win over Senglea Athletic.
16:41
Experts has dismissed prostate cancer as the official cause of death for the Chilean Nobel Prize winner, Pablo Neruda. For decades, many bel...
16:30
Maltese government offers €1 million reward for information leading to the identification of those responsible for Daphne Caruana ...
15:06
The Nationalist Party, Labour Party, AD, NGO Aditus, KNZ, and student organisation SDM to attend Sunday’s demonstration.