Elderly sex offender has sentence reduced on appeal

A 76-year-old man who was found guilty of permitting the defilement of a minor through the use of pornographic material has seen his two-year sentence cut due to 'wrong application of the law'

In October 2013, a court found the elderly man guilty of permitting the defilement of a minor through the use of pronographic material and of using his computer to generate and circulate child pornography
In October 2013, a court found the elderly man guilty of permitting the defilement of a minor through the use of pronographic material and of using his computer to generate and circulate child pornography

A 76-year-old man who was sentenced to two years in prison for having permitted the defilement of a minor through the use of pornographic material has had his punishment reduced on appeal owing.

The case dates back October 2013, when a court had also found Giuseppe Calleja guilty of having used his computer to generate and circulate pornographic material involving two minors.

The accused, whose name was also registered under the sexual offenders' list, filed an appeal claiming that he deserved a lesser punishment owing to a wrong application of the law.

The court of appeal, presided by Mr Justice David Scicluna, observed that the facts of the case had taken place in February 2005 and that the accused's computer had been confiscated by the police six months later, in August.

In December 2007 the law was amended so that the punishment for the improper use of technology to generate or circulate pornographic material involving minors was increased by one or two degrees when the minor was under the age of 15.

Since this aggravating factor did not exist at the time Calleja committed his crime, the court of appeal reduced the punishment from two years to 15 months.

However, the court saw “no reason” to uphold a plea for an alternative punishment on account of the accused's relatively old age.

"He was certainly mature enough to realise that he was violating the law and that his actions could seriously traumatise his victim's," the court concluded.

Michael and Lucio Sciriha appeared for the defendant.