Back
Register for SMS Alerts
or enter your details manually below...
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Password:
Hometown:
Birthday:
Sorry, we couldn't find that email.
Existing users
Email
Password
Sorry, we couldn't find those details.
Enter Email
Sorry, we couldn't find that email.

Tobacco lobbyist who made Dalligate complaint, no longer on ethical committee

Former Commission official Michel Petite, was Philip Morris lawyer who made Dalligate complaint to EC secretary-general

matthew_vella
Matthew Vella
18 December 2013, 12:00am
Michel Petite (right)
Michel Petite (right)


Updated 19 December 2013

The European Commission will appoint a new head of its ad hoc ethical committee, after a complaint from three NGOs about an alleged conflict of interest concerning its previous head.

Former EC head of legal services Michel Petite was reappointed in December 2012 to a three-man ethical committee that is supposed to regulate lobbies and their influence in Brussels. But Petite himself works as a lawyer for the firm Clifford Chance, and represents tobacco giant Philip Morris.

The Commission saidit had decided to appoint Nikolaus Van der Pas to replace Michel Petite as a member of the Ad Hoc Ethical Committee. "Mr Petite recently informed the Commission that he wished to resign as a member of the Committee. President Barroso thanked Mr Petite for his important role in providing independent and impartial advice over a period of four years," the Commission said in a statement.

In his services to Philip Morris, it transpired that Petite met with Commissioner officials in September 2011 and September 2012 - a fact revealed during the Dalligate affair when MEPs received answers to written answers (no. 15, page 36) which also dealt with Petite's meeting.

Philip Morris operates a joint-venture with Swedish Match - the Swedish company that filed the complaint with the EC that Maltese entrepreneur Silvio Zammit had asked for a €60 million bribe to reverse a snus ban - for the sale of snus outside of Scandinavia and the United States.

The complaint, which Petite forwarded to EC secretary-general Catherine Day, led to the OLAF investigation that claimed there was circumstantial evidence that Commissioner John Dalli was aware of Zammit's bribe.

The Ethical Committee, to which EC president José Barroso reappointed Petite for a second term, gives advice on ethical issues, such as commissioners taking up new jobs in the private sector after leaving the Commission.

The European Ombudsman, Emily O'Reilly, welcomed the Commission's decision to appoint a new head instead of tobacco lobbyist Philippe Petite.

"The credibility of the Commission's Ad hoc Ethical Committee was at stake. I am glad that the Commission has followed my advice to replace the head. It was difficult to argue that the client-related activities of the previous head did not constitute a potential conflict of interest. It is important that the European public's suspicions can now be dispelled," Emily O'Reilly said.

The Ad Hoc Ethical Committee consists of three persons and advises the Commission, for example, if a former Commissioner wishes to accept a job in the private sector might undermine the integrity of the Commission.

In February 2013, three NGOs complained to the Ombudsman about Petite's re-appointment. The NGOs alleged a conflict of interest, as he represents private interests in his contacts with the Commission and does not therefore meet the necessary requirements of independence.

At first, the Commission rejected the complainants' arguments and stressed that the complainants did not give any proof of a concrete conflict of interest.

In the Ombudsman's view, the mere possibility that Petite might have been influenced by private interests was unacceptable. The Commission followed her advice and appointed a new chair, ensuring that public concern about the committee's credibility and integrity could be allayed.
matthew_vella
Matthew Vella is executive editor at MaltaToday.
avatar
Janice Sant
If it was not clear then, and much clearer now, that the Dalligate was all about tobacco interests, why did the local police proceed against Dalli then? To say that Dalli was attacked by Tobacco interests is no fairy tale, because we all have seen films depicting the power that Tobacco companies have! What made the local Police act against Dalli if the case was not clear cut and that now we are seeing the full tapestry of the whole affair? Who was behind Dalligate?
avatar
Yanika Chetcuti
medsun or madsun (if you prefer,) seeing you like the bananas, ehh sorry, Bahamas so much. Why not ask high PN officials to elaborate on their roles in this affair? It is very strange as to why they did not defend Dalli at all! Anzi.......doubt was sowed with indecent haste, using the customary, specially appointed rottweilers.
avatar
medsun qerda taghmel xi haga hazina b'daqshekk, ma tafx li barra l-isem ta Dalli hemm l-isem ta Malta f'dan il-kaz?
avatar
Maltatoday - never missing an opportunity to defend John Dalli even if the connection is tenuous at best. Why don't you establish the reason for the secret trip to the Bahamas?