Gonzi at crossroads: ‘PN looking like anti-EU Labour in 2003’ - Muscat

Opposition leader Joseph Muscat said Lawrence Gonzi’s government was at a crossroads as the Nationalist Party faces a crisis inside its own party over the result of a consultative referendum on divorce.

Faced by an outcome against his wishes, Gonzi has yet to declare whether he will vote in favour of a divorce bill that was approved by referendum last week. Several ministers and MPs on the Nationalist side are voting against the bill, while a handful are abstaining from the vote in a bid to ensure the divorce bill passes.

“The Nationalist Party is split in three and has yet to realise the spirit of compassion and tolerance…” Muscat said in a party address today broadcast on One Radio. “The PN finds itself at a crossroads and it can choose to either bury its head in the sand and refuse to budge from its confessional stance, or wake up to the reality in Malta. If it doesn’t change its position against divorce, it will be just like Labour’s own anachronistic opposition to EU membership after 2003.

“Gonzi has no choice as prime minister but to vote yes – he is not just any other MP but the very head of the government’s executive that proposed the idea of a referendum. If his role is to have any significance after this vote, he has no choice but to vote yes.

“Gonzi has a clear stand against divorce and is letting his MPs vote against the bill. But the will of the people must be respected with a yes vote. Even though other MPs who don’t vote yes should abstain, those who will vote against the bill will carry the responsibility of their action themselves.”

Muscat also warned that MPs next week had a decisive vote on the honoraria motion and had to choose whether they would be voting “in favour of Gonzi or vote with society” – referring to the hush-hush salary increases awarded by the Cabinet to ministers, and which were never forwarded to the Opposition leader and the Speaker.

Muscat’s week saw party heavyweight Marie-Louise Coleiro Preca, who campaigned against the introduction of divorce, announce her departure from the politics by deciding not to contest the forthcoming general elections. On the other hand, the figurehead of the pro divorce movement Deborah Schembri announced she would be running on a Labour ticket.

Muscat said the effects of the divorce referendum demanded a healing process after the division that cropped up in society and families over the past month. He said the separation of Church and State was instrumental in a society that recognised the role of the State as a regulator and the Church’s fundamental position in society.

“They are essential relations which must however recognise the state’s central role as a regulator of civil society, that must care for everyone, but respect everybody’s religious beliefs without any interference, and must not discriminate between citizens. Labour has no problem with the Maltese church and its work, which has filled in the void left by one government after the other in the field of hospices for the disabled, drug addiction, elderly care… it has a fundamental role to play in society. I see it as an essential partner in the development of Maltese society and we bear no grudges: we see a significant role for the Church even if we disagree with certain public declarations.”

Muscat also accused Gonzi of failing to read the signs of the times, cornering his party “in a position that takes it back 30 years, a confessional party that doesn’t tolerate but imposes its will upon others.”

avatar
Look the Church needs to protect its interests = money! Read this: https://mazzun.wordpress.com/2011/06/07/flus-flus-u-aktar-flus/
avatar
Iddahhaqnix Joe !!! Igifieri il-LE rebah??? bhal Partnership mela
avatar
Paul Sammut
@jborg1 Man, can't u understand simple logic or simple English. Dr Muscat was honest and sicere enough and did not exempt himself or his role in 2003. Is it that political passion stuns your brain or is it perhaps that u may possibly be just plain stupid?
avatar
It is astonishing how the PN is trying to compare the EU referendum with the Divorce referendum. For those who wear blinkers and seem to forget much too early, the MLP (now PL) had declared after the 2003 elections that it will respect the will of the people, help in obtaining the best benefits from the EU and participate in all EU institutions. History speaks for itself. In MEP elections, PL 4, PN 2. It is now up to the PN to declare (not empty declarations, as those being uttered by Gonzi until now) that it will respect the will of the people, vote for divorce, and assure whilst it is still in government that it will make it possible for the least number of couples who have to resort to divorce in future.
avatar
Submitted on Sun, 06/05/2011 - 13:47. *new ....it will be just like Labour’s own anachronistic opposition to EU membership after 2003. If my memory serves me right, Joseph Muscat played a vital role in 'Labour own anachronistic opposition... - I do not think I need to say more. Facts speak louder than words. imma issa with hindsight taf int...
avatar
http://mazzun.wordpress.com/2011/06/04/il-ligi-severa-tar-referendum-dr-gonzi-se-jizloq-bhal-dr-sant/
avatar
....it will be just like Labour’s own anachronistic opposition to EU membership after 2003. If my memory serves me right, Joseph Muscat played a vital role in 'Labour own anachronistic opposition... - I do not think I need to say more. Facts speak louder than words.
avatar
How can you abstain 'to ensure a Yes vote'? You can only vote Yes or No - if you want to abstain, you have to leave the building. So how can not being in the building 'ensure a Yes vote'?
avatar
This and other issues will cost the PN very very dearly. They will be swept in the next election. Their defeat will be so huge that it will take them 40 years to recuperate. They squeezed the people dry, they take them for fools and yet for them everything is rosy! We never voted labour but from now on we will. Enough is enough. As for the local church because of their meddling they lost half of the herd already and will lose the other half if they go on like this. People have grown up!
avatar
"Labour has no problem with the Maltese church and its work, which has filled in the void left by one government after the other in the field of hospices for the disabled, drug addiction, elderly care… it has a fundamental role to play in society. " YOU DON'T NEED A FRIGGING CURIA - A VATICAN AND AN ECCLESIASTICAL HIERARCHY TO PROVIDE SOCIAL CARE.' . SOCIAL CARE IS PART AND PARCEL OF THE WELFARE STATE IN ALL DEVELOPED COUNTRIES. . THE CHURCH IS FOR THE RELIGIOUS. . SOCIAL CARE (minus religion) IS FOR EVERYONE.
avatar
So Joseph Muscat is an 'opportunist'. So bloody what? He is a politician and a leader of a party. It is his duty to be an 'opportunist' if that is what you want to call it. I prefer to use the word ''astute' but who cares? Why quibble on words. The PN in bed with the Church proposed a referendum in the firm belief that there would not be a majority in favour of divorce. Spiccat harja fuq wicchom! Serves them right. Good on Muscat for giving Gonzi, the PN and the Church a migraine.
avatar
Gonzi is very hard headed and that will be his downfall. https://mazzun.wordpress.com/2011/06/04/dun-joe-bejrut-borg-ihossu-offiz/
avatar
in fact I really do fail to understand why the NO Mps are still sticking to their guns when it was decided by Parilament to toss the ball at the electorate to decide. the writting is on the wall and very clear too, Nays MP should use their conscience to ensure that the Law being drawn up does Justice to all who apply for divorce. this current situation and NO MP status is really worrying and a grieveous threat to Democracy.
avatar
The title of this article should not be giving such a great justice to the PN. . The PN is looking much worse, because Alfred Sant in 2003 included abstentions with the no vote after he had repeatedly told his followers to stay at home or invalidate their vote by scribbling ‘Viva Malta’ on the ballot paper. Even he stayed at home because he showed his vote when interviewed after the vote. So the mathematics argument is not justified, as is the conscious argument.
avatar
Issa jnaqqas l-income tax fil-budget li jmiss u nofskom li qed tgergru kontra l-PN tergghu ttuh il-vot ghax tecitaw ruhkom. Paroli biss.
avatar
Kemm gew tajjeb fir-ritratt dawk li jpappuwa tajjeb!! Kollha fuq paga minima ghaddejjin!!
avatar
I totally agree with Joseph Muscat on this matter even though I believe he is an opportunist. Its time for the PN to do some true restructuring to avoid the worst ever defeat in the polls.