Back
- or -
Email
Password
Sorry, we couldn't find those details.
Enter your email address:
Sorry, we couldn't find that email.
Register with MaltaToday now
Register below to start posting comments, receive SMS news alerts and subscribe to our newsletter.
or enter your details manually below...
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Password:
Hometown:
Birthday:
Sorry, we couldn't find that email.

BA amends right-of-reply rule for TV bulletins, current affairs programmes

The Broadcasting Authority will also ensure that rights of reply will not be “hindered” by the imposition of “unreasonable” terms or conditions by broadcasters.

Teodor Reljic
27 March 2012, 12:00am
Nationalist MP Francis Zammit Dimech says that the amendment is not to limit the use of right of reply but make it more effective where such right really exists

The Broadcasting Authority has announced changes to the rule of right-of-reply last week. The amendments to the law now state that instead of news bulletins and current affairs programmes are no longer legally bound to publish a right of reply.

According to a press release issued last week, television and radio newsrooms have the option to reject a call for a right of reply if it involves "a punishable act, would render the broadcaster liable to civil law proceedings or would transgress standards of public decency".

According to the standards for news bulletins and current affairs programmes, any person whose reputation and good name have been damaged by incorrect facts broadcast on TV or radio, can exercise a right of reply.

The Broadcasting Authority will also ensure that rights of reply will not be "hindered" by the imposition of "unreasonable" terms or conditions by broadcasters.

It will also ensure the reply will be transmitted within a reasonable time if request itself has been "substantiated", and always at a time and manner appropriate to the broadcast to which the request refers.

Former PN culture minister and broadcaster Francis Zammit Dimech said that the overall effect of the amendment "is not to limit the use of right of reply but make it more effective where such right really exists," adding that it "appears to protect the freedom of expression as applicable to broadcasters, except where the reputation and good name of an individual entity have been damaged by an assertion of incorrect facts".

However, Zammit Dimech added: "I would personally prefer the Authority to issue some guidelines to explain better the impact of the amendment since the wording used can be subject to different interpretations."

 

Teodor Reljic is MaltaToday's culture editor and film critic. He joined t...
Christian Thorn
Full MEDIA CONTROL by BIG BROTHER! If you cnnot get round it, legalise it!
John Inguanez
I have not seen the amendement regarding right of reply. But does this also exclude a right of reply under the Press Act? That is the question!
Victor Laiviera
This looks like authoritarianism by stealth. The PN's grip on the throat of Public Broadcasting tightens by the hour.
peppi x
"the wording used can be subject to different interpretations." Actually reading through the article one can come to different conclusions, one of which is that more rope-way is being given to the national broadcaster to discard any replies sent by political parties which, in the way these stations are run, would really serve well the Party in Government.