Back
Register for SMS Alerts
or enter your details manually below...
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Password:
Hometown:
Birthday:
Sorry, we couldn't find that email.
Existing users
Email
Password
Sorry, we couldn't find those details.
Enter Email
Sorry, we couldn't find that email.

Iraq Inquiry: Report to announce findings on war in Iraq

Sir John Chilcot says the report will criticise individuals and institutions; hopes it will help answer some questions for families of the 179 Britons who died in the military intervention between 2003 and 2009

6 July 2016, 8:40am
Sir John Chilcot will publish his 12-volume report on Wednesday
Sir John Chilcot will publish his 12-volume report on Wednesday
Future military action on a scale like the Iraq war should only be possible with more careful analysis and political judgement, according to the chairman of the UK’s inquiry into the Iraq war.

His 12-volume report on the Iraq war is due to be released later – more than seven years after the inquiry began.

Sir John Chilcot told media it would criticise individuals and institutions and said he hoped it would help answer some questions for families of the 179 Britons who died between 2003 and 2009.

The US, which led the intervention in 2003, lost 4,487 service personnel in the war.

Figures about Iraqi deaths vary from 90,000 to more than 600,000.

The war ended Saddam Hussein’s regime in Iraq, but the aftermath unleashed sectarian violence that has killed thousands since then.

The worst attack happened last weekend when so-called ISIS militants – who control swathes of Iraq and Syria – launched a suicide bombing in the Iraqi capital, Baghdad, killing more than 250 people.

Chilcot said: “The main expectation that I have is that it will not be possible in future to engage in a military or indeed a diplomatic endeavour on such a scale and of such gravity without really careful challenge analysis and assessment and collective political judgement being applied to it.

“There are many lessons in the report but that probably is the central one for the future.”

Then Labour prime minister Tony Blair appeared before the panel twice
Then Labour prime minister Tony Blair appeared before the panel twice
The former top civil servant said he believed it was a “reliable account” of the decisions that led to the UK’s participation in the US-led invasion of Iraq, which toppled the regime of Saddam Hussein, and its aftermath.

Asked why the report – which was meant to have taken a year to complete and is 2.6 million words long – had taken so long to write, Chilcot said it had been an “absolute massive” undertaking.

The then Labour prime minister Tony Blair’s decision to commit British troops to the invasion, following a vote authorising military action in the House of Commons, was one of the most controversial foreign policy decisions of the past 50 years.

Blair was one of more than 100 witnesses to give evidence to the inquiry, appearing before the panel twice, and the report will include details of declassified Cabinet papers, intelligence assessments of Iraq’s weapons capability and private correspondence between Blair and the then US president George W Bush relating to the conflict and the basis for the military intervention.

The report has been handed to Prime Minister David Cameron and will be available once Chilcot finishes making a statement setting out its findings on Wednesday morning.

179 Britons died in Iraq between 2003 and 2009
179 Britons died in Iraq between 2003 and 2009
The relatives of British troops and civilians killed in Iraq are being given access to the report prior to its publication although some are boycotting the occasion believing it will be a whitewash.

Chilcot said the relatives had been “very much in our mind” throughout the process and had been “invaluable in helping to shape the report and where it would lead”.

“I have been very conscious from the start that the families have high expectations and wish to know the truth of all that happened, in particular where their relatives were affected.

“I hope they will feel when they see the report that the broad questions they have in mind will have been, if not resolved, answered to the best of our ability.

“But the key point I would like to make is by revealing all the base of evidence we have, they can see our conclusions and why we have reached them but they can make up their own minds on the basis of the evidence.”

Arguments have raged since 2003 about the legal basis for the invasion although it is not clear whether the inquiry – whose specific remit was to give an account of what happened and to offer lessons for the future – will make a judgement on the issue.

Deals