US refugee ban comes to an end, but ‘enhanced vetting’ implemented

Donald Trump has signed an executive order ending the temporary ban on refugee admissions, while calling for a review of the program for 11 countries deemed 'high risk'

(Photo: TIME Magazine)
(Photo: TIME Magazine)

Donald Trump has signed an executive order, ending his temporary ban on refugee admissions to the US.

The Trump administration, however, called for a 90-day review of the program for 11 countries deemed to be “high risk”.

Trump previously suspended the processing of all refugees to the US for 120 days, as part of a previous executive order, issued in tandem with the travel ban on several Muslim-majority countries.

The 120-day window came to an end on Tuesday, prompting an announcement from the White House, which essentially resumed the US refugee program, but with enhanced security measures, indicative of the “extreme vetting” Trump has called for since being made President.

The White House declined to name the 11 countries, which would be subject to a new 90-day review, commenting only that applicants from those countries in particular would be analysed on a case-by-case basis.

A memo obtained by Reuters stated that the government review would seek “to determine what additional safeguards, if any, were necessary to ensure that the admission of refugees from these countries of concern does not pose a threat to the security and welfare of the United States”.

By the end of 2016, higher security screening was required for most adult male nationals, of Egypt, Iran, Libya, Iraq, Mali, North Korea, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, as well as Palestinians, who lived in those countries. It was not immediately clear if the 11 countries referred to in Trump’s executive order were the same ones.

The Trump administration issued a separate revised travel ban last month, barring entry to immigrants from Chad, Iran, Libya, North Korea, Somalia, Syria, Venezuela and Yemen. That executive order was temporarily halted by a US district judge last week, hours before its implementation. 

As a candidate, Trump vowed to ban all Muslims from entering the US. He also stood aggressively against the acceptance of refugees from Syria, stating that those fleeing the war-torn country “may be Isis”.

“There’s absolutely no way of saying where these people come from,” Trump said at a town hall in February 2016.

The Trump administration announced last month that it wants to cap the number of refugees who enter the country at 45,000 (Photo: Peter Dasilva/EPA)
The Trump administration announced last month that it wants to cap the number of refugees who enter the country at 45,000 (Photo: Peter Dasilva/EPA)

The United States has one of the most stringent vetting systems in the world with respect to refugees. Statistics released by the Department of Homeland Security in June showed that the number of refugees admitted to the US had dropped by nearly 50% under Trump, when compared with the final months of Barack Obama’s presidency.

The executive order issued on Tuesday will also place on hold a program that allows for family reunification for some refugees resettled in the US. The resettling of so-called following-to-join refugees will resume once screening “enhancements have been implemented”.

Opponents of Trump’s travel and refugee bans have argued that the policies were aimed at barring Muslims entry to the US. The administration has denied any intent to discriminate and argued that its travel ban and security changes were meant to protect the US from terrorist acts.

Refugee advocates said Trump’s latest action continued to place barriers before the most vulnerable of populations.

“This will add months, or potentially years, to the most urgent cases – the majority of which are women and children in heinous circumstances who need the permanent and proven solution of resettlement,” said Jennifer Sime, senior vice-president of US programs at the International Rescue Committee.

“With a world facing brutal and protracted conflicts like in Syria, or new levels of displacement and unimaginable violence against the Rohingya – this moment is a test of the world’s humanity, moral leadership, and ability to learn from the horrors of the past.”