Zenith: Prosecution earns reprimand over 'fishing expedition'
The prosecutiony summoned representatives to present all the transactions from the year 2000, when the relevant period was from 2008-2018
The prosecution in the compilation of evidence against Zenith directors Matthew Pace and Lorraine Falzon have been told off by the court for summoning witnesses who had already testified in a magisterial inquiry into the money laundering allegations made against the pair.
Pace and Falzon were among 11 people arraigned in March. They are being charged with money laundering, corruption, and other financial crimes.
During the sitting held on Tuesday morning, the court heard several police officers involved in Pace’s arrest testify. MFSA’s representatives also testified about their findings regarding the company’s history and past transactions.
The uneventful sitting sparked briefly to life when it transpired that one of the witnesses who appeared on behalf of MFSA was presenting documents which she had not prepared herself. The witness was not allowed to exhibit the report in court as she did not know what it contained.
Another witness, the director of Capital Transfer Duty department within the Commission of Inland Revenue, who was tasked with bringing ‘all’ the information the department has on the accused and which also included information on third parties was also not allowed to testify.
The court objected to the dragnet approach adopted by the prosecution who had apparently summoned representatives to present all the transactions from the year 2000, when the relevant period was from 2008-2018. “This is not a fishing expedition,” remarked the court, urging the prosecution to only present evidence relevant to the case at hand.
Lawyers Edward Gatt and Mark Vassallo are appearing as defence counsel for the accused.
The case continues on May 12.
READ ALSO: Zenith placed under court control following money laundering charges against owner
There are no further witnesses for today. Matthew Vella
Gatt raises a point of law. The court cannot permit irrelevant evidence to be presented. “We want to hear about the illegality committed by Hillman et al, otherwise we are just filling files.”
Witness says she was summoned to present “all the data relating to the companies”. The court is livid. Matthew Vella