Gonzi will vote against divorce bill, but 'hopes people will vote in referendum'

Prime Minister Lawrence Gonzi says he will vote against the divorce bill but "hopes that people will have opportunity to vote in referendum."

Prime Minister Lawrence Gonzi has stated he hopes the people will have the opportunity to vote in a referendum on divorce, but declared he will be voting against the bill presented by backbencher Jeffrey Pullicino Orlando.

He refuted claims of adopting a contradictory stance when questioned by MaltaToday during a press conference on Saturday. “I did not go into politics to submit to pressure. If this is what I believe in, I have a duty to see it through. At the same time we need to respect the principle of democracy.”

The PN executive committee earlier approved a motion to give MPs a free vote on a divorce bill after a four-hour meeting that delivered a definite stand against divorce. Deputy prime minister Tonio Borg also declared he would vote against the bill.

During the press conference, Gonzi defended the PN’s stance against the introduction of divorce in Malta by saying that this would not be “in the common good” and that it would “create more problems than it would solve.”

He said the PN‘s position is based “not on emotion, but on a factual and contemporary analysis of the current situation of the family in Malta,” and added that the PN could not agree to legislate “in favour of exceptions or one-off cases.”

In this decision, Gonzi maintained however, both the PN and the party executive were “sensitive to the hardship faced by those undergoing martial break-up,” and added that the PN is both aware and concerned of the way the rate of marital break-ups is on the rise. Measures to address this trend are, he said however, “a different discussion entirely.”

He said that once the Private Members Bill was presented to Parliament, the government had the moral responsibility to tackle it and not “leave it on the shelf,” Gonzi said.

In this regard, Gonzi reiterated how the PN’s position remains that the party is against the introduction of divorce, but that government MPs would enjoy a free vote during on the bill. “All MPs should feel comfortable in being able to vote freely and openly,” he said.

Gonzi said that this free vote is the “biggest sign of an open party” that is receptive to other, possibly divergent, opinions. “We are proud of this position, which I believe is a sign of maturity within a political party.”

Gonzi said that the PN’s slightly amended position retains its original gist in that, given the circumstances, the introduction of divorce would not lead to sustainable families and that it would create more instability.

He replied to statements that parties should not take a stance on the divorce issue by retorting that the PN could not help but take a stance on “one of the most crucial aspects of society.”

In line with the position’s three main recommendations, Gonzi said that the government will be moving to starting the debate in parliament “as soon as possible.” He however declined to deliver specific time-frames, saying that the dates should be freely established along with the Opposition. “We will strongly support an uninterrupted debate.”

Gonzi described the PN’s position that the Bill needs to pass through parliament and be subjected to a vote as a “straitjacket” in that the party has no option but to proceed along parliamentary regulations. “Nobody should have the arrogance to presume to change them, even in this case,” he said.

Gonzi said he hoped that MPs would vote in favour of the Bill at first reading stage, allowing the debate to be held. He expressed hopes for calm and measured debate, and hoped that the issue will not be politicised.

During the second reading stage, which would see a parliamentary debate in terms of the principles of the bill, Gonzi also expressed hopes that MPs would vote according to their conscience.

If the Bill was approved at that stage and moved to the committee stage, Gonzi said the government then intends introduce a clause binding the new law’s coming-into-force to approval by a general referendum.

He however raised fears of a possibility of a divorce without a referendum, should the clause fail to be introduced at committee stage (i.e. rejected by the House prior to the third reading in parliament). “Malta would have seen the introduction of divorce without a referendum,” Gonzi warned.

“While I hope that this does not come to pass, I am duty-bound to mention the scenario’s possibility,” Gonzi said. The committee for the consideration of bills is chaired by a government MP, while the six-man committee is equally made up of government and opposition MPs.

Specifically, the motion states that as long as the divorce bill is passed, a clause is included in the same bill to implement article 3(1)(a) of the Referendum Act that will take the bill to be voted upon by a national referendum within two months.

The motion also states the PN’s opposition to the introduction of divorce, and that no political party in Malta has an electoral mandate to proposed divorce legislation.

Earlier on in the day, former minister Jesmond Mugliett declared himself in favourof the introduction of divorce, and seconded the amendments presented by MP Jeffrey Pullicino Orlando to the executive. Mugliett stressed that the PN must not declare itself against divorce, but "in favour of the family.”

The former minister declared his position at the beginning of this morning's executive, and left the PN headquarters shortly after midday, as the meeting was still in progress. Commenting as he left, Mugliett stressed his belief that a referendum should be held and that "the people should be heard.”

Pullicino Orlando’s amendments called for the State to be given the choice to consider the introduction of divorce. Emerging from the PN’s parliamentary group meeting today, Pullicino Orlando remarked that there was a risk that a referendum would not be held, if the divorce bill is not passed.

An amendment for the motion to consider that the rate of marital separations was on the increase in Malta was approved by the party executive.

Earlier in the day, Jeffrey Pullicino Orlando said he felt the PN’s executive had to focus on a referendum that had been promised by Prime Minister Lawrence Gonzi when Pullicino Orlando first  tabled the bill. "Irrespective of whether we agree with the introduction of divorce or not, I feel that denying this opportunity to the electorate would now seriously damage our democratic credentials," Pullicino Orlando said.

He said he had not presented an amendment in this respect as he was open to any suggestions as to how the eventuality of a referendum could be ensured.

The pro divorce movement Iva attacked the PN's motion, describing it as “a filthy tactic” to turn a promised referendum on divorce into “a possible refer­endum aimed at striking down the proposed law”.

Chairman Deborah Schembri said the holding of a referendum after MPs would have voted yes unfairly created “a twisted double hurdle” for the proposed divorce bill.

avatar
Ara dan il bniedem il veru wiccu u s...u xorta wahda. Bniedem li hu veru ipokrita.Fejn hi is-serjeta li suppost ghandu, dan li jippritka kemm ihobb lill-familji, meta jekk ihares ma dwaru hlief pogguti ma ghandux. Dur dawra ma dwarek u malajr tkun taf ghall minn qed nghid. Tkunx aktar ipokrita. X'se taghmel bill pogguti li ghandek ma saqajk,Sur Prim Ministru?
avatar
Gonzi huwa Ippokrita bahal zijuh. Ghax ma jarax lill xi membri tal Kabinett tighu ikernu lill marthom
avatar
WE HAD THE BISHOP GONZI AND HE WAS A REAL BUSTARD. KNOW WE HAVE HIS NAPHEW SAME CLONE
avatar
I am ex PN supporter, not because of the DIVORCE ISSUE but because for many years the party had a corrupt leadership. Gonzi is a scheming, conniving, compulsive liar, a hypocrite and a corrupt Prime Minister. He takes after his uncle Archbishop Michael Gonzi, the nasty little man who gave interdiction to all members of the Malta Labour Party during his reign of psychological terror during the 60’s. For those who have a tendency to forget he also made it a mortal sin for anyone to read any of the Malta Labour Party’s literature. The sad thing is, the majority of the people obeyed and like sheep they followed. BUT NOT THIS TIME. PM Gonzi’s predecessor Eddie Fenech Adami was the same. This lot, like the church, take pleasure in oppressing the will of the people. As usual the catholic church in Malta added more fuel to the fire and her puppets obey the instructions they get from the curia with eyes wide shut. The church in its medieval way of thinking and behaviour still expects the majority of the general public to follow its instructions. At the same time they make sure that they cover up all the wrongs the church and its clergy have been and are still responsible for. The catholic church supported Nazism (visit: http://nobeliefs.com/nazis.htm) and turned a blind eye to the atrocities committed by catholics (the Nazi were catholics) during WW II. The current pope was a member of the nazi party. He also covered up endless cases of sexual abuse committed by the clergy. Now these so called christain democrat politicians and religious leaders come and preach morality on the subject of divorce. By today’s standard DIVORCE is a civil matter and a basic HUMAN RIGHT and nothing to do with the catholic church. Should the Maltese authorities refuse to implement such a law they should be challenged in the European Court of Human Rights. I have no doubt that no matter which political party is running the country they will have to implement the law whether or not there is a majority in favour of DIVORCE. As for PM Gonzi he should remember that he won the last election by a majority of only one thousand eight hundred (1,800) votes. He did so because he used public funds and other undemocratic means to win. He should resign forthwith.
avatar
kompli ghazaq gonz ghax flahar tal kejk isib lizbieba. clone ta dak il moqziez zijuk lisqof
avatar
The mind boggles trying to understand the mental gymnastics these people go through to please the Church while still trying to not antagonise the electorate. i am very disappointed with the Curia yet at the same time I admrie their cunning. They have vanished into the background, got their lackies to act as proxies and no-one is criticising the puppet masters. Please note how after the initial reaction the divorce bill, with various prelates inveighing on the public with mortal sin and the fires of hell, the leaders of the Curia reined in all their members and left the dirty work to their lay puppets. All the various prelates have fallen silent. Only Joe Zammit has escaped their control. As Baldrick would say 'a cunning plan'. You have to admire the Curia. They are smart, very smart.
avatar
You are right Chikku. How can you vote against and hope the law passes so that people can have a referendum?
avatar
Beautiiful how you put an oxymoron in the headline - LOL
avatar
Kollox marbut mal-voti u is-siggu fil-parlament.............decizjonijiet dejjem jittiehdu fl-interess tas-siggu....sfortunatament ghad ghawn sezzjoni mil-poplu li ghadom jghajxu fil-passat.
avatar
IMPOSING IMPOSING IMPOSING. Leweel ninponnu id-dnub il mejjet. u issa ninponnu dritt li ghandu kull bnidem. kif tista tkun nisrani tajjeb u cahhad dritt lil proxxmu tighek. tista ma taqbilx migheu. izda mandekx dritt tinponilu xjamel b'hajjtu. jekk bnidem neffaq flusu kolla fuq xorb alcoholiku hemm ghalfejn tghamel bhallu?? mux affarih xjghamel f'hajjtu ghandu l-ghazla jaff xinnu tajjeb u il hazin. izda hu ghamel dik l-ghazla mbad wara joqod ghal konsegwenzi. izda hadd mghandu dritt jindahallu. kif tridu bil fors ideffsu imnehirkom fl-affarijiet personali ta haddiehor? kemm hu poplu injorant u ghadu lura!! poplu sandikajr u hsiebu xjamel haddiehor. jekk ma taqbilx ma divorzzju? simple telqitek il mara u maritlek ma haddiehor?.id-divorzzju tohdux ha turi kemm int sodd fi religjon tighek.
avatar
The Prime Minister and indeed some of the ecclesial authorities in Malta are behind the times in more ways than one. John Paul II's 1995 encyclical Orientale Lumen and the Ravenna Statement of 2007 call for a much less rigid interpretation of the contentious issues that have divided and broken the Easter community for the past 1,000 years. By trying to be more holy than the pope, these guys are doing themselves a real disservice.
avatar
@Mr Britt You give us the impression that you use a male chastity belt during the day.
avatar
THANK GOD FOR JPO AND MUGLIETTE AND ALL TO ALL THOSE THAT SUPPORT THE DIVORCE ISSUE.
avatar
@maurice britt Noi I am still married to my wife and happily thank God which only shows you a presumptious person, , but I am not selfish like those who deny others to be happy whatever the circumstances. As regrads which people are living in sin it is not up to priests, bishops or popes and especially people of your kind to decide. Only recently a prominent priest suggested that divorce is better than cohabitation so stop playing the saint. Yes I will crticise those holier-tahn-thou who go about supporting their argument against divorce by using other people's status, they are bigots and hypocrites. Finally I do not agree with a referendum but this should be solved by introducing a responsible divorce law were all loop holes and mistakes that other countries did are dealt with. By the way do you ever hear the pope lamenting the fact that Italy have the divorce law.?
avatar
Joseph Sant
Oh my gosh Mr Britt - how patronizing. I bet you know exactly where you will be sitting in heaven! Gonzi seems to be preparing for any eventuality so whatever happens he will be able to say - I told you so. He's preparing the spin even before there's any need of it.
avatar
@Martinborg, I can visualize people like you clearly. Recently separated, kids grown up, has a new girlfriend, just found out that she's just as bad as you wife even if a little younger GannT i is correct in saying, you are still married to your wife, just as JPO and Muliet are. I doubt your advice to the man Ganni T about mass and Holy communion can be taken seriously by someone like you. So why don't you act like an adult yourself and stop using other people’s lines like ‘get a life’ If you believe that divorce is not a sin then you are the last person who should be talking about holy communion.
avatar
Joseph Pellicano
blajtu JPO, nijtieq naf kemm hadum tielaq lil gonzi, ghandek bajt jew le?
avatar
Aravind
@gianniterribile Are you waiting for your holiness to click his fingers and put you out of your trance ..Brainwashed miskien !
avatar
@gianniterribile Get a life man who cares what you think of others just argue with facts and do not go personnal you sound as much of a hypocrite as your mentor. Tomorrow is Sunday and after foul mouthing your brothers I am sure you'll be in the lead for communion.
avatar
" Gonzi will vote against divorce bill, but 'hopes people will vote in referendum " Is this guy real? He contradicts himself in a single sentence, he has not only proved not to have a "Par idejn Sodi" and No Balls, but now he's is proving to be mentally confused, doesn't know if he's coming or going or if he's here or there. Do the maltese want to be governed by such a confused man? For sure I don't.
avatar
Il-PN irnexxielhu ideffes il-politika partigjana fil kwistjoni tad-divorzju. Hu, minn ghandu bzonn id-divorzju forsi jerga jibda mill gdid ikompli jikrepa.
avatar
It's better without a referendum. We have a representative Government and therefore parliament should decide. Parliament is up for renewal in two years time. If divorce is turned down now it will come up again with the new parliament with different more open minded and conscientious representatives.
avatar
If all PL MP's minus Vassallo that is, who declared himself against, together with JPO and Mugliett and maybe some other PN MP who decides to come out of the closet we should see a referendum at least.
avatar
Jeff Cassar
Salgister, ma tahsibx li ilu jistenna? Jew ha jkun partit maghqud taht il-leader, jew inkella jibqa irrelevanti ghal pajjizna. Nifhem li Joseph Muscat ghandu l-kurrenti kollha kontrieh, heqq hu l-leader tal-labour - x'tistenna... - imma li jipprova jinghogob minn kulhadd m'hiex qieghda tghamillu l-gid.
avatar
Regardless of whatever has been said of JPO, we must all show our gratitude and thank him for showing up the Gonz for what he really is: a hardened hypocrite who will face his last showdown at the hustings. If he's capable of robbing the people their right at the referendum he won't be able to pull the same trick over the hustings. That's where he'll find his Waterloo. Nobody will be able to save him there, not Peppi, not Loo.
avatar
Micheal Bonanno
@sVella. Il-PL jistenna u jisma qieghed. Ma jridx li l-kwistjoni tad-divorzju tigi ppoliticizzata.
avatar
Jeff Cassar
Il-PL ma tidher imkien? Hadu l-weekend off nimmagina.
avatar
Quote On this aspect, the Prime Minister remarked that if this article was not approved at committee stage (ie. prior to the third reading in parliament) “Malta would have seen the introduction of divorce without a referendum.” Unquote To my mind, if proof were needed that this particular emperor has no clothes on, than the above statements clinches it for me. Does the man really think that all his subjects are thick?
avatar
So he wants a referendum but will be voting against giving the people a referendum!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Hawadni ha nifhem
avatar
Ganniterribile INT MINDT HADD U XEJN BIEX TIDDETA LILI JEW LIL HADDIEHOR XNAMGHEL BHAJJTI. JEKK JIEN IRRID NIDIVORZJA GHANDI IKOLLI L-GHAZLA LI NGHAMILA! INT GHANDEK L-GHAZLA LI MA TIDIVORZJAX GHAX M'GHAWX LIGI TA DIVORZZJU, BISS LILEK U MIN JAHSIBA BHALEKK. NGHIDILKOM HAGGA WAHDA! LI TILABUWA TAL QADDISIN. TAF META TURU LI VERA TIRISPETTAW IL RELIGJON?? LI META IKUN GHAWN ID-DIVORZZJU JEKK INT VERA TEMMEN U INT KONTRA ID-DIVORZZJU U GEJT BZONNU. AVOLJA GHANDEK IT-TENTAZZJONI MA TUZAHX!!! BISS L-EBDA PERSUNA MA TISTA TIMPONI FUQ HADDIEHOR XTAMEL FIL HAJJA PRIVATA TAHA. DA JMUR KONTRA DRITT TAL BNIDEM! FIL PAJJIZI GHARAB NGHIDU U NGORRU GHAL KONTRA IL FUNDAMENTALISMU ISLAMIKU! BISS DAN IL PAJJIZ SAR FUNDAMENTALIST KRISTJAN! JIEN IMUR KNISJA U JIEN NISRANI IZDA NEMMEN LI INT U LEBDA POLITIKU MANDU DRITT IC-CAHHAD LIL HADDIHOR MI DRITTIJIET FUNDAMENTALI TIGHEU. GHANDEK DRITT LI MA TAQBILX MA DIVORZJU U TIEHU POSIZZJONI KONTRIH. PERO HALLI IL POPLU JIDECCIDI. U JEKK VERA JPO JEMMEN DAK LI QIGHED ISOSTNI U JIGILED GHALIH JIRIZENJA MINNUFIEH U JWAQA IL GVERN JEKK DAN IC-CAHADNA MI DRITT DEMOKRARTIKU LI NSEMMAW LEHINNA U NGHAZLU XI RIDDU U MA RIDUX! JPO URI LI MUX QED HEMMEK JUST BIEX ISAHHAN IS-SIGGU U TRESSAQ IL BILLS FIL PARLAMENT U TIGI TRATAT TA 2 KLASSI
avatar
Jeff Cassar
From left to right: dak li nqabbad jikkopja tlett darbiet, dak li gideb fil-parlament, dak li kull xahar huwa ostagg ta' xi backbencher, dak li hedded kunsiliera ta' sittin sena, l-ispin doctor. Irrid naghmlu l-wallpaper tieghi dan ir-ritratt
avatar
Peter Cassar
hawwadni ha nifmhek...if the PM (unlike my good self who believes that this is a matter for parliament to decide on) is so enthusiastic about the referendum why not simply pass an ad hoc law calling a referendum on this issue rather than relegating divorce to a double insurance policy against divorce?
avatar
It is by now obvious to all that JPO has no alternative but to leave GonziPN. If he does he will appear as the most consistent man in Malta, if he doesn't he will become the laughing stock of the House of Representatives. There's no third way. JPO must admit he has been tricked by the Gonz who has more adviser than he, not least the sharks inside the Curia. The latter is still adamant on clinging on to power. Is this a source of wonderment? Why should it? The Prime Minister is a Gonz, remember? So was Gonz the Archdictator of Malta. It's in their DNA: conspirators, a family of conspirators. JPO has no such DNA. He must admit he has been cornered by the hardened schemers coming from the Gonz tribe. You must either take the plunge, Jeff, or Just Pull Over. Not even Schumy would find a third alternative to this lost race.
avatar
Aravind
Dictatorship at its finest .
avatar
I agree that everybody have to have a FREE vote. This is all bull first the members of parliament are saying we should have a referendum if it pass in parliament but if it will not US people we will not get a chance. Who elected these people also there was nothing on the electoral program of no party re their increase of wages and they did it. I THINK THE PEOPLE SHOULD GET UP AND BE COUNTED AND TEACH ALL OF THEM A LESSON> so much arrogance we the people money and choice. Before they vote in parliament people should know how is how> PEOPLE OF MALTA BE COUNTED.THE CHURCH SHOULD LEAVE THE CIVIL PART TO DO ITS OWN THING NO IMPOSITIONS AND JUDGING OF ANY SOULS
avatar
Isabelle Borg
Ghala qassis jew soru jistghu jinhallu mir rabta ma kristu u jizzewgu, Dak mhux sagrament ukoll ? Hbieb ir-religjon tajba, imma il knisja u min immexxija le.
avatar
mess? lollllllllllllllll u le kem qedghin sew. l-ispizjar milli jkolu jaghtik ;-) mess min ikun hazin u jibqa u povra tfal u l-mara jew ir-ragel skond il-kaz- fir-referendum sfortunatament jivvotaw min l-anqas biss jaf x'differenza hemm bejn sigra u zokk lolllllllllll. kolu tort tal MPs dan- dik missom dahluha mill-wwel ghax dak dritt fundamentali ta-INDIVIDWU mhux ghal kulhadd- izda ghal min ikolu bzonn
avatar
X'jinjoranza Pura! Lollllllllllllll min m aghandux bzonn id-divorzju (forsi) ghalha qed jiftah halqu? x'injoranza lollllllllllllllllllllllllllllll jekk persuna jemmen li ghnadu/a zwieg bsahhtu , il-ghala qed jibza li jkun hawn il-ligi tad-divorzju?:) jekk tidhol il-ligi tad- divorzju jekk int temmen li verament ghandek zwieg bsahtu - il-ligi mu swer taghmnmillek xejn lilek ta ! jahasra imma kemmma jifmuxxxx nehhu din il-biza li ghandkom - m ataghmilx sens- ghaliex jekk persuna trid titlaq lil ohra just taqbad u titlaq.
avatar
GHADU M'GHADDILUX IL-PERIT. Jitkellem dejjem kontra l-linja tal-partit. Ftit ilu kien hawn min qal li referendum huwa hela ta' flus, ghax il-ligijiet mil-Parlament jghaddu. Jiena naqbel ma' din il-haga, l-ewwel isir id-dibattitu imbagahad jekk jghaddi jsir ir-referendum.
avatar
Ganniterrible, Didn't couples who got married and later got an annulment make vows too? And didn't couples who got a divorce abroad and came back to Malta make vows as well? Both are currently acceptable. So either you accept the the principle for all or non at all.
avatar
Ganniterribile (what an apt name!), methinks it is you who is trying to impose your own myopic views on the rest of society. People who are happily married (like you, presumably) will not be obliged to take advantage of a divorce law. However it is no place of yours to interfere in the private and personal lives of people whose marriage has brought them much pain and many problems.
avatar
Pauline Moran
Ganniterribile...you are just living in your own little world. Grow a foot and dont be a hypocrite when it comes to people's rights. Divorce is a right to be used by those who need it to re-marry and not by those who are happily married!!! Capis!!!
avatar
JPO claims he is catholic. he is not. He is still married to his wife Marlene and she to him. Enough of this confusion. You made a vow to your spouse and want to break it and claim you never made it. Then you expect us to respect your views on dividing the family and marriages like this. Live your own mess but do not impose these non values on us all. Marriages are strong in Malta. We do not need more confusion.
avatar
Jeff Cassar
JPO = balls
avatar
I have one vote, JPO will not get it next time. I cannot vote for Muliett. He is not in my district. If he were, AS A i WOULD NEVER VIOTE FOR ANYONE WHO HAS A SELFISH APPROACH TO THE FAMILY. if these men want to pretend they never made a vtow to their spouses, then let them. They want us to accept that infedelity is OK. it is NOT JPO AND JM.
avatar
It-Tort kollu tal-knisja kattolika, dik hija tahdem min taht. mhux hawn Malta biss ta, izda madwar id-dinja kolha. sa fl-ahhar Babilonja the great taqa'!
avatar
Who cares about being the "most despised person in the party"? Jeffrey is standing up for what he believes and - what's more - he is being consistent. He is not the one who has changed his mind here: promised one thing first and is now bent on doing things another way. He is right to be insisting on consistency. Besides, being the most despised person in a party does not mean much. In the end it's how well respected you are among the people which counts. That's where the votes come from.
avatar
Aravind
@Ganniterribile maybe you will not vote for him but i do believe if he sticks to his believes and the divorce referendum comes through ...Your non vote will be far out weighed with the supporters he will encourage .
avatar
I have heard that he has become the most despised person in the party but interesting, by both sides. I am a little surprised about the way he upset PL to be honest. I thought they were chiefly pro-divorce. I suspect it has more to do with upsetting the status quo as politicians don’t like surprises like these. It seems that JPO has managed to upset his party as well as the opposition. His is like a spoilt child who wants to always get his way. Not voting for him next time round, no way.
avatar
I am in favour of certain civil liberties but the way JPO is making a mess of the party is not correct. He has developed a very large head. I think he must believe that he is bigger than the party. he talks of democracy when he did not have a democratic right or mandate to impose his views on all of us. He is a liability and he will pay for it in 2013 elections. I defended him in the Mistra case. I believed him. He is a master of deceit and I will never vote for him again. Maybe we should have a divorce option but these gangster politics are just repulsive.
avatar
sewwa! U dan ir-referedum er jivotaw in-nies kollha ovvja! sewwa! 1. kemm huma nfurmati n-nies xi tfisser ligi tad-divorzju? 2. l-aktar dawk ta certu eta' nfurmati u jafu xi tfisser il-kelma divorzju? 3. kemm tqassmu karti f'kull dar?kemm hemm lesti e-news biex jintbatu lil-kulmin japplika ghal e-news, bhal ma kine hemm dhum Malta fl-Unjoni Ewropea? 4. x'informazzjoni hawn ghal dawk li hliej jisimaw lil dak u lil iehor m'hawnx , kemm huma nfurmati uhud min-nies? nahseb li kollox ghal qabel l-elezzjoni jien -hemm mexjin- poplu Malti , nahseb ser ikollok tistenna jien kif jghidulek l-MPs ,l' hemm qedha triq. ftakru li l-vera sahha qedha f'idejkom Poplu Malti! sakemm ma jkunx hemm xi sorpriza fil-parlament- it-triq qedha li ser jhallu kollox ghal-qabel l-elezzjoni- Kollox ghal poter, voti voti voti Possible li l-maggoranza tal-poplu Malti ser tibqa "Yes Sir"!