Momentum opposes warrants for journalists

Momentum is opposing an introduction for journalists, warning that such a system could undermine press freedom.

In a statement, the party argued that journalism should not require a state-issued licence or warrant, describing the proposed system as a potential threat to freedom of expression, particularly in Malta’s politically polarised environment.

Momentum committee member Matthew Agius said that requiring journalists to obtain a warrant could create a “chilling effect” on reporting, particularly on sensitive political and financial matters. He argued that the system could give politicians greater protection from scrutiny.

The party said it agreed with concerns raised by the Institute of Maltese Journalists that a warrant system could make journalism less accessible. It argued that journalists currently enter the profession through different educational and professional backgrounds, and that restricting access to warrant holders could reduce the diversity of voices and perspectives in the media.

Momentum insisted higher standards and stronger practices are needed in journalism, but argued that these should be achieved through industry-led regulation and professional standards rather than state-issued licences.

Agius also expressed concern that the proposal had come from the Opposition Leader Alex Borg, arguing that efforts to improve journalistic standards should not result in what he described as institutional overreach.

Borg made the proposal earlier this week, but in an interview on Sunday, he clarified that he is only in favour of such warrants if journalists are on the same page. 

Momentum said that independent media organisations, self-regulation and accountability were preferable to government involvement in determining who could practise journalism.