MaltaToday.com.mt - Author highlight

Malcolm Mifsud

Malcolm Mifsud is a partner at Mifsud & Associates.

Articles by this author

Pre-existent view of adjacent property does not automatically exclude spoliation

Law Report

Malcolm Mifsud

A judge ordered the plaintiffs to be re-instated in the full possession and enjoyment of their property as enjoyed prior to the installation of this window

Conflicting evidence leads to judgment confirmation

Law Report

Malcolm Mifsud

The party asking for a retrial must prove the reason why the case should be heard again

Law Report 24 February 2017, 7:30am

Trademark must be predominant to be exclusive

Law Report 17 February 2017, 8:00am

Parties had every right to ask for division of property

Law Report 10 February 2017, 8:04am

The elements required in order to prove the offence of judicial or legal perjury

Law Report 3 February 2017, 8:03am

Administrative decision must be notified to applicant and not to lawyer

Law Report 27 January 2017, 9:00am

Civil courts are competent to decide on all civil matters

Law Report 20 January 2017, 8:04am

Tenant is legally bound to take care of his premises as though it were his own

Law Report 13 January 2017, 8:01am

Court turns down claim that sale of car was null

Law Report 6 January 2017, 8:44am

Court declares that mistake was no mistake

Law Report 30 December 2016, 12:20pm

Warrants handed out following successful academic qualification

Law Report 23 December 2016, 8:41am

Insurance policy holder should be in breach of policy to be held responsible for damages

Law Report 16 December 2016, 9:49am

Strong evidence required to prove a right

Law Report 2 December 2016, 8:11am

Malcolm Mifsud

Pre-existent view of adjacent property does not automatically exclude spoliation

Conflicting evidence leads to judgment confirmation

Trademark must be predominant to be exclusive

Parties had every right to ask for division of property

The elements required in order to prove the offence of judicial or legal perjury

Administrative decision must be notified to applicant and not to lawyer

Civil courts are competent to decide on all civil matters

Tenant is legally bound to take care of his premises as though it were his own

Court turns down claim that sale of car was null

Court declares that mistake was no mistake

Warrants handed out following successful academic qualification

Insurance policy holder should be in breach of policy to be held responsible for damages

Strong evidence required to prove a right

No need of court case, once contract solves the differences