Muscat defiant on IIP, says PN ‘tarnished Malta’s name’

Prime Minister says citizenship sale is necessary for national development fund to address Malta’s healthcare and infrastructural needs

Prime Minister Joseph Muscat says Malta was sovereign on citizenship rules.
Prime Minister Joseph Muscat says Malta was sovereign on citizenship rules.

Prime Minister Joseph Muscat is showing no signs of ceding to pressure from the Nationalist Party to repeal a citizenship scheme that has been criticised by the European Parliament and the European Commission.

In an interview on Radju Malta today, Muscat said that instead of raising taxes, the Individual Investor Scheme would reap an estimated €1 billion from the sale of citizenship, 70% of which will be channeled to a National Economic and Development Fund.

Muscat was asked by presenter Andrew Azzopardi whether Malta was appearing as being "in desperate need of money", to which the prime minister said that with the same argument, "the previous government would not have worked as much for funds from the European Union, as that could also have been interpreted as Malta being in dire straits.

"They (the PN) did the right thing to lobby for funds when they were in government, and we are doing the right thing now," he said.

Muscat said that Malta was internationally considered an economically-advanced country, and that the citizenship scheme would not change that perception.

The prime minister also disagreed with the assertion that the national sentiment seemed to be against the IIP. "This may have to be explained better, but I don't agree that the Maltese people are seen as not wanting it."

Muscat also criticised the Nationalist Party's effort to discredit the IIP in the European Parliament. "The Opposition's stance is one of panic as it realised that this was a good investment for Malta," he said.

Referring to the Nationalist MEPs' stance in the European Parliament, the prime minister attacked the Opposition for "tarnishing Malta's name outside of its borders... this infighting should be fought out in Malta and not in front of the European Parliament."

Muscat said the EP's resolution was non-binding and that Malta was sovereign to implement such schemes without the approval of the European Parliament.

When probed as to why the Labour Party had not mentioned the IIP in its electoral manifesto, Muscat replied that the government was simply moving with the times. "The mistake this government made was that it did not market the scheme appropriately."

Judges' impeachment

Asked what stand he took to the motion of impeachment against Magistrate Peralta, the prime minister said that due to the fact that the investigation was still ongoing, he would prefer not to comment so as not to prejudice the investigation.

He did say, however, that the motion of impeachment against Farrugia Sacco was something that the government was still pursuing.

Poverty and healthcare

Muscat spoke of a "very real and worrying" picture of poverty in Malta, saying that many people were working for low salaries and pensioners were living in poverty.

"5,000 jobs were created during the last legislature but around half of these were taken up by foreigners, and this is a problem that needs to be tackled from a grassroots level."

Muscat also spoke of Mater Dei's bed shortage, and the need for more beds in homes for the elderly so that social cases are not left inside hospital wards. "A hospital is a place where instant care is given... and if there is a need for more space in homes for the elderly, then we need to address that issue," he said.

He said that it was easy to look at the former St Luke's general hospital as a potential solution, but stressed that re-opening the old hospital would cost millions just to refurbish. "The previous administration knew about this problem but, for what I can only imagine were political reasons, did not address the issue," he said.

When asked if continuing with a system of free healthcare was in any way unsustainable, Muscat said that making people pay for the healthcare they receive would be the "easy was out" for government.

"The issue of waste and a lack of coordination has to be seen to... A lot boils down to money, yes, and a government can easily get that money by increasing taxes, but we certainly do not want to do this," he said.

He said that it was for reasons such as this that the country needed to create means of economic growth, citing the Individual Investor Programme as one example of this.

avatar
Lil min tafu tistaqsix ghalih. Dawn ghomorhom u zmienhom hekk. Ippruvaw jimminaw il-Gvernijiet fis-snin 20. Ikkonfoffaw biex ghamlu l-Gurament Falx ta Terinu kontra Strickland. Ikkonfoffaw kontra Mintoff u Alfred Sant. Qed jikkonfoffaw kontr Joseph Muscat u kontra Malta. Din hija fid-DNA tal-PArtit Nazzjonaisat li mhux biss m'huwiex denn li jkollu dak l-isem imma huwa insult ghall-istess isem ghax min ikun Nazzjonalist jahdem gha pajjizu mhux kontra tieghu.
avatar
Dear Prime Minister,Do not expect anything better from the opposition,they beleive only in themselves not in our beloved Malta! You have a very powerful vote of confidence,so just lead the way and we "true Maltese" will follow.Viva Malta!
avatar
Dr Muscat, parir ta wiehed xih. Il Partit hekk imserjjah Nazzjonalista ghax dan l-isem qatt ma xeraqlu u iktar u iktar wara li warrbu lill Gorg Borg Olivier minn Leader. Malta ghalihom hi mezz kif jiffangaw u jippuzaw ghal-hmerijiet. Ftakar fil-Malta files u ftakar f'minn kien imdahhal fiha gild ta haruf jilbsu imma lpup kienu ghadhom u jibqghu. Ftakar fil-qwtil ta Karen Grech u Raymond Caruana, ftakar fil-bombi wara bibien minn kien lejali len pajjizu, ftakar kif kienu jjhammgu lill kull minn kien jahdem mal-Gvern Laburista minn xhiex ghaddew lillhom u lill qrabathom. Ftakar fit-tixwix biex hadd ma jigi jinvesti f'Malta. Ftakar kemm xewxu mal gvern Amerikan li sal-flotta Amerikana qrib kien Malta waqt l-elezzjoni tas-sebghinijiet ghax qalulhom li jekk jitla Mintoff l-ghada jaraw il-bastimrnti Navali Russi Malta. Ara ghal fanfartunati u ic-cucvati li hamru lill wicc Malta u b-xorti tajba ma hamruhiex iktar meta il bravu E.F.A. kif rebah l-elezzjoni mar Londra u ordna quddiesa pontifikali f'West Minister Cathedral li hafna Maltin serji li jghixu l-Ingilterra gew imbarazzati biol-mistoqsijiet li sarulhom. U meta lis-stess bravu kien Berlin qabel waqa il-hajt ftahar loi dahal in-nahha ta Berlin tal-Lvant. Immagina kif kien jirredikola lill Malta fil-fora Internazzjonali kieku gie arrestat kif kien jissemma isem Malta. Dr Muscat qatt u qatt ma ghandhekk tafda lill Xmun Busuttil ghax zgur li jekk tafdalu xi sigriet kif ikollu cans li jatak daqqa ta stasllet gio darhek itijielòek
avatar
"5,000 jobs were created during the last legislature but around half of these were taken up by foreigners, Why was this? are these foreigners being paid peanuts if so no wonder, the Employers association opèened its mouth on the IIP with ther PN in government no questions are ever asked as to why foreigners are being employed insterad of locals. If on the other hand its lack of knowledge we should thank the 25 years of N.P. Government contrary to Labour Governments never really cared about technical training I remember Dr Paris minister of Education in an NP Government who introduced Latin in the Corradiono techniical school
avatar
The Maltese people must be amazed at the ineptitude of the Prime Minister when he is left to his own devices. As one can clearly realize and wonder where did the progressive and moderate crowds stand after the failure of this reckless IIP scheme? The disapproval from those who will bear the brunt of the consequences, if the Prime Minister insists of implementing this travesty keeps growing. The senility of the steel soldiers for socialism has been transported underground and it seems they are oblivious of the pre-election slogan of Malta belongs to us all. In less than a year, the appointments of Joseph Muscat within the government bureaucracy of young and inexperienced fraternity are slowly emerging as the cause of administration uncertainty and government indecisions. The youth that Joseph Muscat promoted as leader of the PL are so confused by the domestic turmoil and the foreign tongue lashing this scheme has generated, that most of them has shed their alliances and has conveniently forgotten to support their Prime Minister at a time when one could indeed be a lonely number. The picture that the Maltese electorate is seeing at present is one that does not fare well for the Prime Minister. The tantrums of being opposed, the obstinacy of being reprimanded by his peers and his determination to march blindfolded as a means of demeaning those who dare question his intentions, will eventually bring his IIP wagon crashing down into the valley of the politically doomed. The alternative to progress and moderate from the original IIP scheme is quite simple really, if cooler heads prevail and the whole truth be told to the Maltese people. The national lens has been focused unobstructed now that the urge to rush the scheme into law without a second thought of how the Maltese citizens felt or how the EU partners will react to its drawbacks. The insistence that a billion euros from this scheme will find its way in the Maltese economy is wishful thinking and the sooner that the Prime Minister quit repeating this unverifiable statement, the sooner he will appear composed to do the checks and balances needed to sell this IIP scheme to the Maltese citizens and their EU counterparts who will benefit or face the consequences. A smart Prime Minister and his minions in cabinet should have considered it a priority to first place the Maltese economy on a solid foundation and not place all their economic eggs this one IIP basket that could backfire and do the most damage to Malta’s foreign relations diplomatically and economically.