Conviction or convenience?
It goes without saying that it would have made more sense for the Nationalist Party to discuss issues such as full-time MPs when in government rather than in Opposition, especially once they had been raised by one of their own party
Almost five years after I raised in Parliament the issue of full-time members of Parliament, the subject seems to have taken this country by storm sparked by a comment by Opposition Leader in the context of PN party financing scandal.
On the 7th March 2012 during sitting number 455 of the last legislature, in fact, as a Nationalist backbencher I had invited a discussion about the subject proposing a smaller Parliament of full-time MPs within the wider context of a Holistic Constitutional and Justice Reform – www.riformagustizzja.com - including the draft Bill on Party Finance that has become law during this legislature whilst ignored during the past one.
In March 2012 the current Opposition Leader was Lawrence Gonzi’s special delegate to connect to society, whilst Tonio Borg, now included in the PN commission to evaluate this proposal, was deputy prime Minister. Highly ranking within government, they had all the clout to push for a discussion on this and other constitutional and justice proposals I had made.
As far as I can remember, not only both ignored my proposals five years ago, but they went as far as banning me from contesting the following election after voting in Parliament, as I had every right to do, against the person who was blocking constitutional and justice reform (which I had proposed and subsequently later confirmed by the Bonello Report), and currently being implemented.
It goes without saying that it would have made more sense for the Nationalist Party to discuss such issues when in government rather than in Opposition, especially once they had been raised by one of their own party in Parliament and within the same party itself.
Such failure could also throw serious doubts about the motive behind raising such issues five years later. Conviction or convenience?
Dr Franco Debono LLD,
Valletta
Time is ripe for Broadcasting Authority reform
Following the resignation of Broadcasting Authority chairperson Tanya Borg Cardona, government has an opportunity to rise above the tribal political division and reform an authority which sadly represents the political parties and their partisan interests rather than the Maltese people in general.
The Broadcasting Authority chairperson should be appointed by a Parliamentary Committee after a public call for applications.
This would guarantee independence, especially when the authority’s board is responsible to ensure that public broadcasting is impartial and fair.
The authority’s regulations are already skewed in favour of the big parties. The notion that political parties ‘balance each other out’ renders a disservice to democracy, pluralism and quality in broadcasting.
The authority must encourage and not discourage pluralism of ideas and modes of expression.
Now is the time to change the way the authority operates and ensure that at least the public broadcaster gives more space to smaller parties and civil society, who unlike the two major parties do not own and control media empires.
The most urgent issue to be addressed is the authority’s composition.
The Broadcasting Authority should be truly independent, and should be led by professionals and civil society representatives not political appointees.
Despite its function as a Constitutional Body, two members are chosen by the Prime Minister, two members are chosen by the Leader of the Opposition, and the chairperson is nominated by the minister responsible for broadcasting or by the Prime Minister.
Effectively, the authority is controlled by persons chosen by and in the interests of the two main political parties. This enforces the perception that political interests come before the public interest, which erodes trust in the authority itself.
A reformed authority should primarily work to raise standards of broadcasting in Malta and protect viewers and listeners and not political parties.
The presence of broadcasting experts together with civil society representatives would help bring a paradigmatic change in broadcasting and give it a much needed breath of fresh air.
Edward Busuttil, Birkirkara
-
National
Malta records 1,606 domestic violence cases since 2021
-
National
Power cuts linked to Malta’s economic model, Chamber of Commerce says
-
National
Over €800,000 in planning fines handed out since 2022 but €166,000 remain unpaid
More in News-
Tech & Gaming
What can you legally play in Malta? A guide for visitors and new residents
-
Tech & Gaming
Is Finland's new gambling act an opportunity for minimum deposit casinos?
-
Business News
CrediaBank partners with BNP Paribas Asset Management to advance wealth management services in Greece
More in Business-
Football
Kevin Keegan dies aged 75 after cancer battle
-
World Cup 2026
Trump can’t help but make it about him as he lingers on stage following World Cup trophy presentation
-
World Cup 2026
Spain are world football champions
More in Sports-
Music
Special late-night buses to run after Isle of MTV Malta concert
-
Music
CAP-Sounds unveils Maltese Hits Vol. III, celebrating Malta's finest original music
-
Theatre & Dance
Malta-first production of Jean Genet’s The Maids to open at Theatre Next Door
More in Arts-
Opinions
IVF reform: Progress achieved should never become an excuse to stand still
-
Opinions
On boats, luxuries and a tone-deaf PM
-
Opinions
Bending over to Sharlon
More in Comment-
Projects
A biomorphic pavilion inspired by Malta's Mosta Rotunda
-
Articles
The mattress that could change how we sleep
-
Magazines
Architecture & Design June edition available to read online
More in Magazines