‘MEPA is rewarding illegalities’, environmental groups claim

The environment NGOs Flimkien għal Ambjent Aħjar, Friends of the Earth Malta, NatureTrust Malta and Ramblers’ Association of Malta expressed dismay that MEPA’s development control commission (DCC) was still issuing decisions contravening MEPA regulations.

The MEPA Auditor has published his report on the Mosta Wied il-Qleigha case, where a meadow was divided into four plots against MEPA policy, the groups said. Two owners gained permits to build reservoirs but abusively built two bungalows instead of reservoirs.

The ENGOs said the highest authorities were aware of all the abuse in this case as were the members of the DCC Board when they approved this permit. “If the MEPA reform is to have any credibility, government must go beyond presenting Dr Mario Demarco as the acceptable public face on this issue.

“The NGOs support the Auditor’s implication that DCC board should resign and the permit be rescinded, however board resignations are no longer enough… The public has looked on silently for too long while our heritage is destroyed by the very officials who are employed to protect it. Malta requires no less than legality now.”

The Auditor said in his report that the site history was "characterised by piecemeal illegitimate accretions to developments that have been approved… This situation is of major concern to Environment Protection Directorate, and should not be rewarded through retroactive sanctioning.”

The Director of Environment added that noting that applicants have demonstrated an inability to adhere to approved specifications, “the proposals are strongly objectionable in principle, and it is recommended that the cases are referred to enforcement unit for direct action, with a view to securing removal of all illegalities and restoration of the site to its original state.”

MEPA’s Heritage Advisory Committee also strongly recommended that application to convert one of the illegal bungalows into stables should be refused. The Auditor concluded: “This is a classic example of how to reward a lawbreaker in his work to create environmental damage. Throughout the processing of the submitted applications the applicant was acting in bad faith.”

avatar
Monique Cauchi
This is the question, which must be asked in this case, how exactly did it get this far? I have seen photographs of these 'reservoirs' and for those who haven't let me describe them. They have high walls all around with remote door entry systems. They have BBQ's with tables and chairs, children's toys all around and of course statues of the Madonna. Now I would assume that MEPA inspected these buildings before they were approved so I was wondering how all these extras were explained away. The fact that these permits were approved mean one of two things. Either as stated in the article above the highest authorities were aware of all the abuse in this case as were the members of the DCC Board in which case they should resign or be fired. The other option is that they didn't bother checking before signing off on the applications in which case they should resign or be fired. At this rate there will be no DCC boards left, as they all seem to be succumbing to corrupt practices. How can the people of Malta have faith and trust in the system when it is rotten from the top down?