‘Citizenship issue settled’ says Commissioner • PM does not specify duration of residency

Prime Minister Joseph Muscat says government will retain capping on citizenship scheme, but fails to specify for how long applicants have to reside in Malta.

Prime Minister Joseph Muscat
Prime Minister Joseph Muscat

The European Commission has declared itself "reassured" with new amendments agreed with the Maltese government on its sale of passports.

Addressing a press conference together with European Commissioner Maros Sefcovic and deputy prime minister Louis Grech, Prime Minister Joseph Muscat said that following talks in Brussels, the Commission had given its seal of approval to the Individual Investor Programme, which will sell Maltese passports - and consequently European citizenship - for €650,000.

IIP citizens must also commit themselves to buy a property of €350,000 or rent one for €16,000 a year for five years, and invest €150,000 in government bonds.

"The Commission has expressed their approval of the amendments which have been made," Muscat said.

Malta will maintain a 1,800-applicant capping on the IIP, despite the European Commission's go-ahead that it could remove the limit, Prime Minister Joseph Muscat said.

Once again, Muscat failed to specify for how long applicants must reside in Malta before being granted citizenship, with Muscat limiting himself to say that there was no need for applicants to reside in Malta for 365 days.

"Residing in Malta for 12 months does not equate to having to physically be in Malta for 365 days," he said, stressing that the definition of residency "falls fairly and squarely" on the individual member states.

"Preventing anyone from going abroad would be against Schengen rules," Muscat added when pressed to define the 'effective residency' requirement agreed with the European Commission.

Muscat insisted that people questioning the residency requirement, were "missing the wood for the trees" and that the "focus should not be on how many days one needs to reside in Malta" to be granted a passport. "The crux of the matter is the good faith in the implementation of this requirement," he said.

Sefcovic, the European Commissioner for Inter-Institutional Relations and Administration expressed his satisfaction at the outcome of the talks concluded yesterday.

The Commissioner said that "the issue has been settled".

"Whilst Maltese law must be respected, we are very happy that a genuine link between potential applicants and Malta has been agreed upon," he said.

"It is certainly reassuring to know that there will be security background checks on such applicants," he said.

Sefcovic said that the recent European Parliament debate triggered by Malta's scheme had "opened" the Commission's eyes on other similar schemes, which he said will be scrutinised in the same way as Malta's programme was.

When asked as to what the relationship was between the Commission and Malta, in light of the IIP debate - Sefcovic described it as "excellent".

"The cooperation and understanding was very good, and the relationship remains an excellent one," Sefcovic said.

Muscat also put weight behind this statement, saying that it was the duty of the Commission to ask questions, but also the duty of government to safeguard national interest.

Sefcovic also praised Malta for its resilience during the economic recession and for its emphasis to create employment opportunities for its people.

He also stressed the need for a good voter-turnout in the upcoming EP elections, thus ensuring that the people will be brought closer to the European institutions.

Muscat agreed, saying that a low turnout could result in such institutions becoming "marginalized, misjudged and misinterpreted".

avatar
While one is residing in Malta one can also go on holiday I suppose or are we living in some dictatorship.?
avatar
Mela hemm skemi ohra? Daqs kemm qaliulna 'LE' Metsola u Casa. Lewwel intom u imbaghad l-klikka li ghada tahkem lil Partit? Riformi? Lol!
avatar
Well said Micallef. A., in both comments.
avatar
The debate had opened the commissions eyes on other similar schemes! Meximxuwa sew din qabda Traitors tal PN! Mela hemm skemi ohra fl-Ewropa? Ghalfejn attakajtu lill Malta? PN is sahta ta Malta!
avatar
Just grin and bear it PN and stop trying to undermine Malta.
avatar
truthBtold still writing long essays about the bleeding obvious...ie...The Gonzi-Simon -pn, made another messup and it is high time to fall in line with all Malta, The European Union, constituted bodies, unions, and that master called COMMON POLITICAL SENSE
avatar
Imbierek Alla, meeting ta xi saghtejn solva il-problemi kollha li kella s-Sinjura Reading. Jekk hu hekk din is-sinjura verament taf tirrecita.
avatar
TruthBtold: The issue about the IIP " has been settled ". This was said by the vice-President of the commission. It was also made clear that the way how the residency of IIP applicants is monitored, rests withb the Maltese government, not with the commission, since this is a matter of national competence. So please, stop trying to keep creating doubts, where there are none !
avatar
What you see is what you get with Simon.
avatar
Dottoressa Anne Fenech, nispera mhux tippanikja, titmashanx aktar, u ikkalma, issa SCRAP YOUR PN PARTY - Kief jghidu IS-SEWWA JIRBAH ZGUR ! u hekk gara.
avatar
ROBERTA METSOLA, DAVID CASA, KAROL AQUILINA, JASON AZZOPARDI, issa ghandhkhom terfghu ir-responsabilita tal-hsara li ghamiltu lil poplu Malti. IRREZENJAW u itolbu skuza lil-poplu !
avatar
Just as we have been saying all along, but his royal highness Simon busuttil was rather unbelieving. And he is a lawyer, he will never have me as a client.
avatar
Bye bye Simon. You need a break. Muscat was right all the way. The cake was not rotten, it only needed the cherry.
avatar
It is good to read that the IIP scheme has had another amendment for residency, in order to continue on its road to implementation. It was also a surprise to discover that the entity that the Prime Minister has chosen to promote this scheme H & P will be collecting over 200 million euros for its management. Nice work if you can get it, but most importantly let the Maltese people hope that this ghastly contract does not lead Joseph Muscat on the road to perdition. The Prime Minister has been very slick when it comes to discussing the total expenses the government will absorb to implement this scheme and furthermore neither has the opposition tried to come out with an assessment. To be fair to both side of parliament it has been months since the law was passed through parliament and before the shit hit the fan and Malta found itself humiliated and degraded in front of its EU membership. The one billion euros that Joseph Muscat has entrenched in his assessments that this plan will contribute to the treasury, it is beginning to sound a far fetched illusion when you consider the costs of all these amendments and problems in Strasbourg and Brussels. When the H & P management fees are also deducted at a rate of 20% commission, the Maltese tax payers has a right to ask what the fanfare that the Prime Minister first introduced about this scheme is all about. Considering the embarrassment and PAC costs due to the previous administration dealings with foreign contracts on oil imports and bunkering, what guarantees can the Prime Minister give to the Maltese people that this IIP scheme will not encounter the same underhandedness and collusion that the cost of doing business in Malta demand.
avatar
Se iddumu iggebdu il-lasktwa? Issa dejjaqtu lil kulhadd! L-Unjoni Ewropeja ghandha 'il-freedom of movement' kif se tisforza biex xi hadd joqghod hemm u mhux hawn? Imma pero,jekk Simon Busutill irid jibghat l-iswadra tieghu ta 'skifezza' immexxija mill-leader promittenti tal-PN is-simpatiku, dhuli Karol Aquilina, dik affarih. Jien ma nafx, imma nahseb li SimonPN qed jiehu l-pariri ta min hu 'bitter' u ghandhu bzonn Rennie kull siegha; ghax hlief 'pranks' u negativizmu mhux hiereg 'mill-leadership' tieghu!
avatar
Maltese resdiency laws apply. That's what the Commission agreed to and that's what's going to be applied.
avatar
The Agreement reached between the Maltese government and the EU Commission on IIP is a step in the right direction so that the political process in Malta may continue and the details of the programme may be further discussed during the debate for the forthcoming elections to the European Parliament to be held in June this year. After all the devil is in the detail.