Register for SMS Alerts
or enter your details manually below...
First Name:
Last Name:
Sorry, we couldn't find that email.
Existing users
Sorry, we couldn't find those details.
Enter Email
Sorry, we couldn't find that email.

Taxman claim for €759,000 in unpaid VAT from bankrupt PriceClub fails

An objection made by former director of PriceClub was upheld by a judge, to a €759,000 VAT bill

Matthew Agius
15 November 2017, 8:09am
The Price Club supermarket had gone bankrupt after amassing too many liabilities in a bid to slash consumer good prices
The Price Club supermarket had gone bankrupt after amassing too many liabilities in a bid to slash consumer good prices
A judge has upheld an objection by a former director of bankrupt supermarket PriceClub to a €759,000 VAT bill on the grounds that it was addressed in a way that meant he was not able to legally challenge it.

Back in 2005, the VAT department had sent Chistopher Gauci, a director of PriceClub, a letter requesting payment of Lm326,154 in tax arrears, holding him personally liable for the debt and giving him 30 days to settle the outstanding amounts.

Gauci had never been notified of any estimates before he received the letter and had asked for more information from the company liquidator.

He sent letters to the Commissioner for VAT, calling upon him to retract his claim, but did not receive a response.

In the absence of any other way forward, Gauci had sued the VAT department, asking the court to declare the decision to hold him personally responsible for the amounts due from PriceClub Operators Limited and carry out a judicial review of the VAT department’s actions.

The VAT department had justified its singling out the plaintiff by saying that Gauci had been a director at the time and therefore was responsible for the company’s obligations at law. The obligations pre-dated the dissolution of the company by a long way, it said, alleging that PriceClub had sent estimates to the Board of Appeal which contained “false figures and blatant irregularities.”

The VAT due had also remained unpaid, it pointed out, saying the demand notice and subsequent judicial letter were issued in accordance with the law.

In a judgment handed down in the First Hall of the Civil Court on Tuesday, Judge Silvio Meli noted that the VAT Department had asked the court to hold Gauci personally responsible for the amount owed by the company, including tax, administrative fines and interest.

The judge also observed that through these proceedings, the plaintiff was asking the court to declare the defendant’s department’s decision to hold him responsible for the amount due to it as null.

It was clear that when the tax fell due, the plaintiff had been director of the company and its representative and responsible for the obligations, said the court, agreeing that it appeared that the obligations preceded the liquidation of the company.

But it emerged that the estimate of tax requested by the Commissioner for VAT had not been sent to the plaintiff and addressed to him in his own name, but in the name of PriceClub Operators Limited.

This meant that the plaintiff was not in a position to exercise his right to contest the estimate before the Board of Appeal of VAT once the company went into liquidation, said the court.

Therefore, the demand notice eventually issued by the Commissioner for VAT was also invalid, ruled the judge, dismissing the VAT appeals board’s arguments and upholding the plaintiff’s request.

Court reporter Matthew Agius is a Legal Procurator and Commissioner for Oaths. Prior to re...
Latest Business News
Business Comment 15-01
Markets roundup, new pickup truck for Ford and Fiat’s plans to increase profits by 2022 
Business Comment 12-01
European markets overview, BMW to set up in Russia and oil on the rise 
Technology 12-01
Facebook will prioritize 'meaningful social interactions' over 'relevant content' on its News Feed in the coming w...
Law Report 12-01
Although a claim listed in an application may be unclear, other premises mentioned in the same application may throw light on what is being ...
Business Comment 11-01
Investors taking profits, Ferrero buying Nestle & Kodak diving into blockchain