Assisted Dying: Needs and realities of people will prevail | Daniel Micallef
'In my opinion, the Assisted Dying Bill strikes a very sensible balance with lessons learned from other countries that have introduced such or similar legislation'
It has been quite a while since I followed such a profound, well-researched, and respectful parliamentary debate. Those who followed can attest that we witnessed a very high-level debate in the House of Commons—a truly respectful discussion focusing on policy, which is what politics should be about.
Being a staunch supporter of the introduction of individual rights when it comes to end-of-life decisions, I was intrigued not just by the Bill being discussed but also by the contrasting views being put forward.
One could deduce a lot of common denominators between the speakers in a debate that cut across party lines, both those for and against.
The defining line for those against it was the fear of the Bill being discussed as the beginning of a slippery slope. Justified? Maybe if the proper rules are not in place.
Eventually, it is the legislator’s responsibility—both those present and future—to ensure that it’s not the case.
This can be achieved by upholding the spirit of the law and the integrity of the discussion rather than by refusing to enact much-needed change or, worse, by offering sympathy while overlooking the suffering of terminally ill patients and their families. Unfortunately, it’s safe to say that we’ve all been (or are, or will be...) there.
In my opinion, the Assisted Dying Bill, given the nod during the second reading at the Palace of Westminster, strikes a very sensible balance with lessons learned from other countries that have introduced such or similar legislation. Several safeguards are being proposed, even though some of them I fail to comprehend, such as the involvement of the judiciary in the process.
Prime Minister Robert Abela has publicly stated that, as promised, the discussion will take place and serve as a precursor to a decision that must be made.
I hope the debate will be civilised, mature, and rooted in facts. I’m not holding my breath, though, given what I’ve witnessed during the divorce, civil unions, and IVF debates, among other issues in recent years. However, I firmly believe that, as in other circumstances, at the end of the day, the realities faced by people and their needs will prevail.
Daniel Micallef was the former Deputy Leader of the Labour Party
-
National
President meets young girl who donated her hair to help sick children
-
National
Parliament’s foreign affairs committee condemns repression and killings in Iran
-
National
Former Birgu oil depot to be transformed into 1,500sq.m public garden
More in News-
Business News
Mġarr Port Taskforce meets for first time
-
Business News
RPI annual rate of inflation up to 2.7 per cent in December
-
Business News
IHI to sell 72 per cent of five-star Corinthia Hotel Lisbon
More in Business-
Football
Malta to be promoted through four-year partnership with Melbourne-based football club
-
Football
Siena Calcio reject €1.3m takeover bid from Joseph Portelli
-
Football
Looking forward 2026 | A World Cup of records
More in Sports-
Cultural Diary
My essentials: Stephanie Borg’s cultural picks
-
Music
Eurovision 2026: Malta sends Aidan to Bella Vienna
-
Music
PBS defends decision not to allow Rhiannon repeat performance after in-ear monitor complaint
More in Arts-
Law Report
Whether accused received fair trial or not depends on whole criminal process
-
Opinions
Parents and persons with disabilities should not be ignored | Marthese Mugliette
-
Opinions
Europe’s competitiveness at a crossroads: Power, principles, and pragmatism
More in Comment-
Recipes
Wild fennel and hazelnut pesto
-
Recipes
Caramel brownie trifle cups
-
Magazines
In conversation with architect Duncan Muscat
More in Magazines