[WATCH] Busuttil makes case for sound economy, no answer on Farrugia tax inquiry

‘No reason not to believe Tonio Fenech’, Busuttil says over TCU inquiry that failed to connect oil trader George Farrugia to company at heart of oil kickbacks.

File photo: Simon Busuttil says there is no reason not to believe statements from the finance minister (left).
File photo: Simon Busuttil says there is no reason not to believe statements from the finance minister (left).

Nationalist deputy leader Simon Busuttil has stood by an official statement from the finance ministry yesterday that denied any identifiable connection between oil trader George Farrugia and the company Aikon Ltd, that has been the subject of a tax fraud investigation since August 2011, and is still ongoing.

FULL STORY here MFSA documents contradict ministry's claims

"I have no reason not to believe Tonio Fenech," Busuttil said of the finance minister, who on Sunday was reported telling the Sunday Times that the Tax Compliance Unit could not link Aikon, the company at the heart of police investigations related to kickbacks from Trafigura to a former Enemalta consultant for the supply of oil to the state utility, to its beneficial owner.

Farrugia will turn State's evidence to testify against others involved in the network of commissions paid by Trafigura, whom he represented, in criminal procedures set to commence shortly.

But Busuttil was unable to explain why a search in the companies registry, which MaltaToday carried out yesterday, confirmed that Farrugia was already the identifiable owner of Aikon as early as January 2011.

The deputy leader was also questioned again on the energy minister who was responsible for Enemalta over the kickbacks that were paid in 2004, defending Austin Gatt's right to open a bank account in Switzerland which the minister failed to declare after 2005 in his parliamentary returns.

"Labour's contradiction is that Joseph Muscat wants clean politics, and instead his party tries to throw mud by connecting Gatt's bank account to the oil procurement investigation," Busuttil said, referring to the bank accounts held by George Farrugia and the former Enemalta consultant Frank Sammut, for the receipt of the Trafigura commissions.

"Everybody has the right to open a bank account anywhere since we joined the EU. Why would somebody think that exercising this right is wrong?"

Gatt has stated that he inherited a UBS funds account that his father opened in 1973, but failed to declare in his parliamentary returns after 2005. "A number of Labour MPs failed to declare their assets in the parliamentary registry," Busuttil said, without naming the MPs.

Busuttil today made a compelling argument to voters to trust the Nationalist government with the stewardship of the Maltese economy, saying Labour Force Survey statistics had confirmed that 20,000 jobs had been created over the past five years, including 5,000 redundancies reversed throughout the financial crisis that engulfed Europe.

The MEP said Malta's deficit ranked the lowest amongst Mediterranean states, citing as an example the bankrupt Greece which in 2011 was reeling with a deficit of 9% of GDP - compared to Malta's 2.7% deficit in 2012.

Malta's deficits breached the 9% mark in 1998, but also in 2003 at the threshold of EU membership.

Busuttil also claimed Greece's deficit in 2011 was at the same level registered in 1998 under a Labour government.

"We strongly believe only the PN can guarantee an economy of a sound footing, your job, and your family's standard of living. Our ambitious objective for the next five years is the creation of 25,000 new jobs."

Busuttil said a re-elected Nationalist government would reduce income tax to 25% over the next three years for earners grossing between €19,501 and €60,000; reduce tax on property purchases and remove inheritance tax on all residences; extend childcare not just to full-timers but to part-timers, students and flexitime workers; and grant sick leave to parents to tend to their sick children.

Busuttil said giving vouchers to parents was a fairer option than creating public-private partnerships as proposed by Labour. "Vouchers will give parents the freedom to choose which childcare centre they can pick. They can pick public centres, but a voucher will allow them to pick a private centre at an established rate."

avatar
Dear Simon Your approach to Malta politics is similar to a learned scholar who thinks that the students in the class are a bunch of gullible inbecicles! I know how to decide what is wrong from right and decide what constitutes a happening from being a hindrance to my aspirations for a better outlook than a PN political philosophy of shut up and listen to what we say is right! Mate your time is up and together with the PN need to make way for change!
avatar
Just who are these clowns think they are fooling? Had it involved a tax recovery of € 5,000 or far less, I am sure you would have got a conviction, and/or at least a charge in court. But this case concerned millions, as per the files made available to the Ministry, and consequently to the TCU. It was apparently also very evident that a lot of money was in play. Now GF's local companies were all on MFSA, so a simple search by ID number of his directorships should easily have exposed the connection to all the rest, especially the group's local oil procurement company! As someone noted, Mr GF was already listed as a director of this company Aikon from very early 2011. An alert investigator would have made the relevant associations, and would have sourced other connecting data via the TCU's data warehouse. Is it possible that there could have been uncovered connecting facts relative to EneMalta'S oil business? If there was not, how could this have been missed? Incompetence or what???? Moreover, I read somewhere that the TCU's Board of Directors are all sourced from the different tax departments, on purpose, so there would be effective coordination. I am sure that a case involving millions should have been drawn to their attention, and they might have in turn informed their higher ups, all the way up! And I suppose an investigation of this "portata" would have been followed up regularly at the monthly Board meetings, and all very senior Ministerial officials would presumably have been kept abreast of any outcome or progress. If not, someone f**ked up big time!!! What the heck are we paying our civil servants for? Or could it be that as this happened in summer, everyone was enjoying his afternoon siesta!!! Back to GF. So aren't Directors responsible for the company's affairs for taxation purposes? OK, shareholders would be taxable, but any wrongdoing they would pass back to Directors. One might then ask, why didn't the TCU do likewise, rather then give up as soon as they hit a Chinese wall? They tell us " Hold on. Don't rush. The investigation is ongoing" OK, fine! Had this been so difficult, I would have agreed. However, it seems a wealth of info was passed on to the Ministry/TCU, and not some pieces of loose paper held by a paper clip! So all the investigative work only needed corroboration. I am sure many other taxpayers were hounded for far, far, far less.
avatar
Once again Simon disappoints and embarrasses. His recent appointment was ill-timed and PN cannot afford a deputy leader who prattles inanely and who is clearly out of his depth when faced with sound argument.
avatar
Luke Camilleri
I still find it even hard to believe that the IRD did not remind or call Dr. Austin Gatt on why he did not continue to declare his funds in his Swiss Account! They are so watchful on us common mortals ........READY TO IMPOSE FINES and other charges if we miss out and Dr. Gatt admits he did not declare funds for 5 years with the arrogance that this is the norm for him and his kind! Shouldn't the IRD investigate and fine....or will he be given an AMNESTY?????
avatar
"Gatt has stated that he inherited a UBS funds account that his father opened in 1973, but failed to declare in his parliamentary returns after 2005" Very simple Mr. Simon - if I fail to declare an income (let alone a bank account) I will be asked to pay fine as I am just labelled as a 'TAX EVADER' and no big head from the PN will come for my rescue. Another point is the fact that if one inherits a bank account from someone such an account will be transferred to the new holder, unless it is a bearer account (subject to correction on this)
avatar
"Gatt has stated that he inherited a UBS funds account that his father opened in 1973, but failed to declare in his parliamentary returns after 2005" Very simple Mr. Simon - if I fail to declare an income (let alone a bank account) I will be asked to pay fine as I am just labelled as a 'TAX EVADER' and no big head from the PN will come for my rescue. Another point is the fact that if one inherits a bank account from someone such an account will be transferred to the new holder, unless it is a bearer account (subject to correction on this)